Engage and Explain, Account, and Closure Phases in Mock Witnesses' Investigative Interviews

ABSTRACT Evidence‐based investigative interviewing protocols are central to the training of police investigators. While past research has focused on analysing the questioning types and styles used by police officers, there is growing interest in the Engage and explain, Account, and Closure phases of the interview. The objective of our study was to analyze the use of evidenced‐based interviewing techniques advocated in these phases of the interview among experienced police officers at the beginning and at the end of a training course. We evaluated 28 mock witness investigative interviews conducted by 14 police officers, half of whom had previously received training in an evidence‐based interviewing technique. We used a scoring grid of 14 recommended interviewing techniques. The results showed that at the end of a training they used an average of 11.2 components whether they had been previously trained or not, but that there is room for improvements. Future research and training recommendations in evidence‐based investigative interviewing protocols are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.70026
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engage and Explain, Account, and Closure Phases in Mock Witnesses' Investigative Interviews

Rebecca Milne, Céline Launay, Jacques Py, M Brunel et al.
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Engage and Explain, Account, and Closure Phases in Mock Witnesses' Investigative Interviews

Rebecca Milne, Céline Launay, Jacques Py, M Brunel, Zoé‐Aïssatou Balde
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evidence‐based investigative interviewing protocols are central to the training of police investigators. While past research has focused on analysing the questioning types and styles used by police officers, there is growing interest in the Engage and explain, Account, and Closure phases of the interview. The objective of our study was to analyze the use of evidenced‐based interviewing techniques advocated in these phases of the interview among experienced police officers at the beginning and at the end of a training course. We evaluated 28 mock witness investigative interviews conducted by 14 police officers, half of whom had previously received training in an evidence‐based interviewing technique. We used a scoring grid of 14 recommended interviewing techniques. The results showed that at the end of a training they used an average of 11.2 components whether they had been previously trained or not, but that there is room for improvements. Future research and training recommendations in evidence‐based investigative interviewing protocols are discussed.

Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender ProfilingVol. 23(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Université de Lille (FR), University of Portsmouth (GB)
Université de Lille
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.