Advancing wildfire risk assessment: From static frameworks to dynamic, forward-looking approaches under a changing climate

Anthropogenic climate change, land-use patterns and socioeconomic indicators are increasingly shaping wildfire risk. Conceptual risk frameworks, such as the IPCC’s hazard, exposure and vulnerability model, emphasize dynamic interaction of their components, yet most operational wildfire risk assessments still treat these drivers as static by relying on historical baselines for present-day conditions or integrating projections for only one of the risk components in forward-looking assessments. This review highlights the resulting gap between the conceptualization of risk and its operationalization, which limits the ability to anticipate future wildfire risk. We examine global wildfire trends, existing risk frameworks in climate-related risk assessments and evaluate the limitations of applying these frameworks in spatiotemporal assessments. We then propose a framework that treats the determinants of risk as space and time-dependent, integrating historical, current and projected datasets to characterize how wildfire risk changes over time. This approach enhances our capacity to anticipate changes in wildfire risk and supports more forward-looking and adaptive risk management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333261480971
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing wildfire risk assessment: From static frameworks to dynamic, forward-looking approaches under a changing climate

Eileen Mburu, Lawrence M. Kiage
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Advancing wildfire risk assessment: From static frameworks to dynamic, forward-looking approaches under a changing climate

Eileen Mburu, Lawrence M. Kiage
article en

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change, land-use patterns and socioeconomic indicators are increasingly shaping wildfire risk. Conceptual risk frameworks, such as the IPCC’s hazard, exposure and vulnerability model, emphasize dynamic interaction of their components, yet most operational wildfire risk assessments still treat these drivers as static by relying on historical baselines for present-day conditions or integrating projections for only one of the risk components in forward-looking assessments. This review highlights the resulting gap between the conceptualization of risk and its operationalization, which limits the ability to anticipate future wildfire risk. We examine global wildfire trends, existing risk frameworks in climate-related risk assessments and evaluate the limitations of applying these frameworks in spatiotemporal assessments. We then propose a framework that treats the determinants of risk as space and time-dependent, integrating historical, current and projected datasets to characterize how wildfire risk changes over time. This approach enhances our capacity to anticipate changes in wildfire risk and supports more forward-looking and adaptive risk management strategies.

Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Georgia State University (US)
U.S. Forest Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.