Sulfonamide‐Based 2‐Amino‐1,3,4‐Oxadiazole Derivatives as Dual Cholinesterase and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Kinetic Characterization, Molecular Modeling, and ADMET Evaluation

ABSTRACT In this study, 12 novel sulfonamide derivatives incorporating 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole and 1,3‐benzazol‐2(3 H )‐one scaffolds were synthesized and structurally characterized using 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and LC–MS analyses. Their inhibitory activities were evaluated against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), carbonic anhydrase I and II (CA I and CA II), and α‐glucosidase. Owing to their potent inhibitory profiles, enzyme kinetic studies were performed to determine inhibition constants ( Ki ) and inhibition mechanisms. The synthesized compounds exhibited potent nanomolar cholinesterase inhibition. Compound 5b was identified as the most active AChE inhibitor (IC 50 = 32.6 ± 2.6 nM; Kᵢ = 7.1 ± 0.6 nM), acting through a competitive inhibition mechanism, whereas compound 5g showed the strongest BChE inhibition (IC 50 = 34.6 ± 2.8 nM; Kᵢ = 8.4 ± 0.8 nM) with a mixed‐type inhibition profile. The derivatives also displayed significant carbonic anhydrase inhibition, with compound 6d emerging as the most potent inhibitor, particularly against CA II (IC 50 = 0.9 ± 0.06 μM; Kᵢ = 0.43 ± 0.037 μM), while exhibiting competitive inhibition and strong activity against both CA isoforms. In contrast, α‐glucosidase inhibition was generally weak, with compound 5d showing the highest activity (IC 50 = 250.5 ± 21.32 μM). Molecular docking studies revealed favorable binding interactions within the catalytic sites of cholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase enzymes, while 200 ns length molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of representative protein–ligand complexes. In silico ADMET and drug‐likeness predictions using SwissADME and pkCSM indicated generally acceptable oral drug‐likeness. Compound 6c exhibited the most balanced predicted pharmacokinetic profile, whereas 6d , despite its excellent enzyme inhibition, showed potential limitations associated with higher polarity, limited predicted blood–brain barrier penetration, and predicted toxicity risks. Overall, these findings identify the synthesized sulfonamide derivatives as promising scaffolds for the further development of multifunctional cholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drug Development Research
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.70375
Primary Topic
Enzyme function and inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sulfonamide‐Based 2‐Amino‐1,3,4‐Oxadiazole Derivatives as Dual Cholinesterase and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Kinetic Characterization, Molecular Modeling, and ADMET Evaluation

Azime Berna Özçelik, Başak Gökçe, Muhammed Tılahun Muhammed, Gülnur Arslan et al.
Drug Development Research
Enzyme function and inhibition
article

Sulfonamide‐Based 2‐Amino‐1,3,4‐Oxadiazole Derivatives as Dual Cholinesterase and Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors: Design, Synthesis, Kinetic Characterization, Molecular Modeling, and ADMET Evaluation

Azime Berna Özçelik, Başak Gökçe, Muhammed Tılahun Muhammed, Gülnur Arslan, Emre Kadir Ayan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, 12 novel sulfonamide derivatives incorporating 2‐amino‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole and 1,3‐benzazol‐2(3 H )‐one scaffolds were synthesized and structurally characterized using 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and LC–MS analyses. Their inhibitory activities were evaluated against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), carbonic anhydrase I and II (CA I and CA II), and α‐glucosidase. Owing to their potent inhibitory profiles, enzyme kinetic studies were performed to determine inhibition constants ( Ki ) and inhibition mechanisms. The synthesized compounds exhibited potent nanomolar cholinesterase inhibition. Compound 5b was identified as the most active AChE inhibitor (IC 50 = 32.6 ± 2.6 nM; Kᵢ = 7.1 ± 0.6 nM), acting through a competitive inhibition mechanism, whereas compound 5g showed the strongest BChE inhibition (IC 50 = 34.6 ± 2.8 nM; Kᵢ = 8.4 ± 0.8 nM) with a mixed‐type inhibition profile. The derivatives also displayed significant carbonic anhydrase inhibition, with compound 6d emerging as the most potent inhibitor, particularly against CA II (IC 50 = 0.9 ± 0.06 μM; Kᵢ = 0.43 ± 0.037 μM), while exhibiting competitive inhibition and strong activity against both CA isoforms. In contrast, α‐glucosidase inhibition was generally weak, with compound 5d showing the highest activity (IC 50 = 250.5 ± 21.32 μM). Molecular docking studies revealed favorable binding interactions within the catalytic sites of cholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase enzymes, while 200 ns length molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of representative protein–ligand complexes. In silico ADMET and drug‐likeness predictions using SwissADME and pkCSM indicated generally acceptable oral drug‐likeness. Compound 6c exhibited the most balanced predicted pharmacokinetic profile, whereas 6d , despite its excellent enzyme inhibition, showed potential limitations associated with higher polarity, limited predicted blood–brain barrier penetration, and predicted toxicity risks. Overall, these findings identify the synthesized sulfonamide derivatives as promising scaffolds for the further development of multifunctional cholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.

Drug Development ResearchVol. 87(6)
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR), Suleyman Demirel University (KZ), Gazi University (TR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Enzyme function and inhibition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.