Flotation Behavior of Lepidolite Using Conventional Amine and Gemini Collectors

Lepidolite flotation was investigated using Armeen C, a conventional primary amine, and a cationic Gemini surfactant (hexanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide), 12-6-12) (HBDB), as collectors. Microflotation tests, electrophoretic mobility measurements, adsorption isotherms, and dynamic foamability experiments were conducted to compare their performance and interaction mechanisms. HBDB produced high lepidolite recoveries at relatively low concentrations of 25–75 mg/L, particularly between pH 5 and 9, whereas Armeen C required higher dosages of 100–300 mg/L to achieve comparable recoveries over a broader pH range. Electrophoretic mobility and adsorption results confirmed the interaction of both collectors with the lepidolite surface, although Armeen C showed stronger charge reversal and higher adsorption density. In contrast, HBDB exhibited substantially stronger foamability, with DFI values ~7.2–7.8 higher than those of Armeen C. These results indicate that HBDB can enhance lepidolite flotation through efficient surface hydrophobization and strong froth stabilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerals
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/min16090864
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flotation Behavior of Lepidolite Using Conventional Amine and Gemini Collectors

Andrés Ramírez, Leopoldo Gutiérrez, Sergio Vladimir Mejia
Minerals
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
article

Flotation Behavior of Lepidolite Using Conventional Amine and Gemini Collectors

Andrés Ramírez, Leopoldo Gutiérrez, Sergio Vladimir Mejia
article en

Abstract

Lepidolite flotation was investigated using Armeen C, a conventional primary amine, and a cationic Gemini surfactant (hexanediyl-α,ω-bis(dimethyldodecylammonium bromide), 12-6-12) (HBDB), as collectors. Microflotation tests, electrophoretic mobility measurements, adsorption isotherms, and dynamic foamability experiments were conducted to compare their performance and interaction mechanisms. HBDB produced high lepidolite recoveries at relatively low concentrations of 25–75 mg/L, particularly between pH 5 and 9, whereas Armeen C required higher dosages of 100–300 mg/L to achieve comparable recoveries over a broader pH range. Electrophoretic mobility and adsorption results confirmed the interaction of both collectors with the lepidolite surface, although Armeen C showed stronger charge reversal and higher adsorption density. In contrast, HBDB exhibited substantially stronger foamability, with DFI values ~7.2–7.8 higher than those of Armeen C. These results indicate that HBDB can enhance lepidolite flotation through efficient surface hydrophobization and strong froth stabilization.

MineralsVol. 16(9)
University of Concepción (CL)
Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.