Do patient-reported outcomes and experiences differ among patient groups accessing community mental health services? Interrogating DIALOG data through the equity lens

AIMS AND METHOD: We aimed to compare differences in DIALOG scale patient-reported experience measures and patient-reported outcome measures scores between different patient groups accessing adult mental health services. Pooled anonymised data of 11 198 DIALOG scores from 5007 unique patients were disaggregated (based on age, gender, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation) and analysed. We compared statistical differences between groups in their means scores, and carried out regression analysis converting data to a binomial for satisfaction to control for variables. RESULTS: Asian and Black patients had greater levels of satisfaction across several domains compared with White British patients. Women, younger patients and those living in more deprived areas had poorer levels of satisfaction. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Disaggregated large routinely collected outcome data can offer useful intelligence on monitoring of health inequity. Overall health inequity assessment needs a nuanced interpretation and triangulation of outcome data with access experience, including coercion and physical health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Bulletin
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2026.10268
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do patient-reported outcomes and experiences differ among patient groups accessing community mental health services? Interrogating DIALOG data through the equity lens

Richard Byng, Rahul Bhattacharya, Stuart Gordon Spicer, Akshith Shetty et al.
BJPsych Bulletin
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Do patient-reported outcomes and experiences differ among patient groups accessing community mental health services? Interrogating DIALOG data through the equity lens

Richard Byng, Rahul Bhattacharya, Stuart Gordon Spicer, Akshith Shetty, Paul Sharpe, Katelyn Smalley
article en

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD: We aimed to compare differences in DIALOG scale patient-reported experience measures and patient-reported outcome measures scores between different patient groups accessing adult mental health services. Pooled anonymised data of 11 198 DIALOG scores from 5007 unique patients were disaggregated (based on age, gender, ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation) and analysed. We compared statistical differences between groups in their means scores, and carried out regression analysis converting data to a binomial for satisfaction to control for variables. RESULTS: Asian and Black patients had greater levels of satisfaction across several domains compared with White British patients. Women, younger patients and those living in more deprived areas had poorer levels of satisfaction. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Disaggregated large routinely collected outcome data can offer useful intelligence on monitoring of health inequity. Overall health inequity assessment needs a nuanced interpretation and triangulation of outcome data with access experience, including coercion and physical health.

BJPsych Bulletin
North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.