From Human-Centered Results to Real-World Impact: Medical Humanities Cross-disciplinary Research

This collaboratively written paper presents three case studies where researchers from the humanities and from biomedicine collaborated on topics related to health and medicine. This process-focused paper outlines several key considerations that can lead to research that successfully integrates medical humanities expertise and more traditionally biomedical forms of inquiry. In the context of an increasing embrace of aggregation, emblematized by the rise of artificial intelligence, we demonstrate how incorporating humanities methodologies can offer research paradigms that can balance out or complement the downsides of aggregated data. The case studies include one that used narrative-based inquiry to study the experience of caregivers navigating pediatric pain management; another that focused on the use of storyboarding in bioengineering and medical device design; and a third that detailed an artistic and scientific collaboration between composers, dancers, and neuroscientists. Crucially, this paper focuses less on the benefits of multidisciplinary research, which have already been documented, and more on the complexities of the multidisciplinary research process. In order to successfully produce human-centered research, every discipline involved in these three projects evinces a dedication to multidisciplinary collaboration from the earliest conception, an embrace of creative and qualitative techniques such as storyboarding, and a willingness to tailor creative expression to serve science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Humanities
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-026-10051-4
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Human-Centered Results to Real-World Impact: Medical Humanities Cross-disciplinary Research

Katherine Shwetz, Anthony Brandt, Sabia Abidi
Journal of Medical Humanities
Empathy and Medical Education
article

From Human-Centered Results to Real-World Impact: Medical Humanities Cross-disciplinary Research

Katherine Shwetz, Anthony Brandt, Sabia Abidi
article en

Abstract

This collaboratively written paper presents three case studies where researchers from the humanities and from biomedicine collaborated on topics related to health and medicine. This process-focused paper outlines several key considerations that can lead to research that successfully integrates medical humanities expertise and more traditionally biomedical forms of inquiry. In the context of an increasing embrace of aggregation, emblematized by the rise of artificial intelligence, we demonstrate how incorporating humanities methodologies can offer research paradigms that can balance out or complement the downsides of aggregated data. The case studies include one that used narrative-based inquiry to study the experience of caregivers navigating pediatric pain management; another that focused on the use of storyboarding in bioengineering and medical device design; and a third that detailed an artistic and scientific collaboration between composers, dancers, and neuroscientists. Crucially, this paper focuses less on the benefits of multidisciplinary research, which have already been documented, and more on the complexities of the multidisciplinary research process. In order to successfully produce human-centered research, every discipline involved in these three projects evinces a dedication to multidisciplinary collaboration from the earliest conception, an embrace of creative and qualitative techniques such as storyboarding, and a willingness to tailor creative expression to serve science.

Journal of Medical Humanities
Rice University (US)
National Science Foundation, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas Heart Institute, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.