MDADI as a Screening Tool for VFSS ‐Graded Swallowing Impairment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine clinically useful MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) thresholds associated with Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS)-graded swallowing impairment in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and to explore whether a reduced-item MDADI could preserve discrimination while minimizing patient burden. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed HNC patients from a prospectively maintained dysphagia surveillance program who completed the MDADI within 120 days of VFSS. Associations between MDADI and VFSS metrics were assessed using Spearman and point-biserial correlations. Swallowing impairment was defined using Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) with clinically relevant dichotomization. Optimal MDADI composite score thresholds were derived using Youden's J statistic, and exploratory item reduction investigated the ability of a concise subset to preserve discrimination of clinically significant impairment. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients contributed 470 MDADI-VFSS observations for PAS and 443 for DIGEST (mean follow-up 3.7 years and MDADI-VFSS interval 56 ± 35.9 days). MDADI composite scores showed moderately strong and moderate inverse correlations with DIGEST (r = -0.63, p < 0.001) and PAS (r = -0.50, p < 0.001), respectively, with good discrimination across both outcome definitions (AUC 0.78-0.88). Optimal MDADI thresholds ranged from 74 to 78 with ~74 best identifying DIGEST ≥ 2. A four-item MDADI short form (F3, E3, E4, and P6) showed strong agreement with Composite score (r = 0.96), with good discrimination of DIGEST-defined impairment (AUC = 0.85). CONCLUSION: MDADI scores correlate with VFSS-graded impairment in HNC patients. A composite threshold near 74 may serve as a clinically useful screening parameter for identifying patients requiring swallowing evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70835
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

MDADI as a Screening Tool for VFSS ‐Graded Swallowing Impairment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Meera Kohli, Clark A. Rosen, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Yue Ma et al.
The Laryngoscope
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

MDADI as a Screening Tool for VFSS ‐Graded Swallowing Impairment in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Meera Kohli, Clark A. Rosen, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Yue Ma, Tyler Crosby, VyVy N. Young, Arushi Gulati, Beatrice Manduchi, Guadalupe Canahuate, Zachary Brumm, Eric A. Anyimadu, G. Elisabeta Marai, Jennifer Silver
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine clinically useful MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) thresholds associated with Videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS)-graded swallowing impairment in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients and to explore whether a reduced-item MDADI could preserve discrimination while minimizing patient burden. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed HNC patients from a prospectively maintained dysphagia surveillance program who completed the MDADI within 120 days of VFSS. Associations between MDADI and VFSS metrics were assessed using Spearman and point-biserial correlations. Swallowing impairment was defined using Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) with clinically relevant dichotomization. Optimal MDADI composite score thresholds were derived using Youden's J statistic, and exploratory item reduction investigated the ability of a concise subset to preserve discrimination of clinically significant impairment. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients contributed 470 MDADI-VFSS observations for PAS and 443 for DIGEST (mean follow-up 3.7 years and MDADI-VFSS interval 56 ± 35.9 days). MDADI composite scores showed moderately strong and moderate inverse correlations with DIGEST (r = -0.63, p < 0.001) and PAS (r = -0.50, p < 0.001), respectively, with good discrimination across both outcome definitions (AUC 0.78-0.88). Optimal MDADI thresholds ranged from 74 to 78 with ~74 best identifying DIGEST ≥ 2. A four-item MDADI short form (F3, E3, E4, and P6) showed strong agreement with Composite score (r = 0.96), with good discrimination of DIGEST-defined impairment (AUC = 0.85). CONCLUSION: MDADI scores correlate with VFSS-graded impairment in HNC patients. A composite threshold near 74 may serve as a clinically useful screening parameter for identifying patients requiring swallowing evaluation.

The Laryngoscope
University of Iowa (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.