The politics of academic survival - Academic resistance under autocratization: lessons from Hungary

This article examines how academic actors resist autocratization in Hungary by analysing three high-profile conflicts between the government and academic institutions: the forced relocation of Central European University (CEU), the restructuring of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), and the takeover of the University of Theatre and Film Arts (SZFE). Drawing on theories of democratic defence and the literature on academic autonomy, the study shows how different levels of salience of the autocratizing measures, partisan polarization, and field-specific resources shape the forms and effectiveness of resistance. The findings reveal that while legal and symbolic repertoires were unable to prevent institutional restructuring, academic actors nonetheless generated long-term forms of democratic defence through knowledge production, transnational networks, and the creation of alternative educational spaces. These cumulative, field-based practices maintained epistemic autonomy even when formal mechanisms of accountability failed. The paper contributes to debates on democratic resilience by demonstrating that academic resistance in hybrid regimes rarely reverses autocratizing measures, yet plays a critical role in sustaining democratic norms, critical discourse, and the capacity for future institutional renewal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Politics and Society
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2026.2718419
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of academic survival - Academic resistance under autocratization: lessons from Hungary

Luca Kristóf
European Politics and Society
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

The politics of academic survival - Academic resistance under autocratization: lessons from Hungary

Luca Kristóf
article en

Abstract

This article examines how academic actors resist autocratization in Hungary by analysing three high-profile conflicts between the government and academic institutions: the forced relocation of Central European University (CEU), the restructuring of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), and the takeover of the University of Theatre and Film Arts (SZFE). Drawing on theories of democratic defence and the literature on academic autonomy, the study shows how different levels of salience of the autocratizing measures, partisan polarization, and field-specific resources shape the forms and effectiveness of resistance. The findings reveal that while legal and symbolic repertoires were unable to prevent institutional restructuring, academic actors nonetheless generated long-term forms of democratic defence through knowledge production, transnational networks, and the creation of alternative educational spaces. These cumulative, field-based practices maintained epistemic autonomy even when formal mechanisms of accountability failed. The paper contributes to debates on democratic resilience by demonstrating that academic resistance in hybrid regimes rarely reverses autocratizing measures, yet plays a critical role in sustaining democratic norms, critical discourse, and the capacity for future institutional renewal.

European Politics and Society
National Centre for Social research (GR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.