Limb Ischemia-Related Interventions and 30-Day Mortality After Femoro-Femoral VA-ECMO: A Pre/Post Implementation-Era Comparison
Background/Objectives: Femoro-femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is associated with limb ischemic complications. Routine near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) monitoring and a more standardized distal perfusion strategy were introduced at our institution in 2016. We compared ischemia-related interventions, amputations, and early mortality between the treatment eras. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing femoro-femoral VA-ECMO from 2012 to 2024 were analyzed retrospectively and stratified by VA-ECMO initiation before 2016 or from 2016 onward. The primary endpoint was a peripheral ischemic vascular complication requiring surgical or interventional therapy; an inclusive sensitivity definition additionally incorporated four clinically plausible but less certain events. Period-specific rates were estimated using Poisson regression adjusted for baseline distal perfusion cannula (DPC) status and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). Results: The analytic cohort comprised 270 patients (45 pre-2016 and 225 post-2016). The primary endpoint occurred in 50 patients (18.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.1–23.7): 3/45 (6.7%, 95% CI 1.4–18.3) before 2016 and 47/225 (20.9%, 95% CI 15.8–26.8) thereafter. Adjusted rates were 4.6% (95% CI 1.0–20.5) and 18.9% (95% CI 13.6–26.3), with an adjusted risk ratio of 4.11 (95% CI 1.06–17.93). The inclusive sensitivity analysis yielded similar estimates (adjusted risk ratio 3.31, 95% CI 1.05–11.47). Five patients underwent lower-limb amputation (1/45 pre-2016 and 4/225 post-2016). Kaplan–Meier 30-day mortality estimates were 56.8% overall (95% CI 50.8–62.9), 58.9% pre-2016 (95% CI 44.9–73.5), and 56.4% post-2016 (95% CI 49.9–63.1). Conclusions: Ischemia-related interventions were more frequently recorded after 2016, while amputations remained rare and 30-day mortality was similar. Because monitoring, DPC practice, and other aspects of care changed concurrently, and NIRS was used without a standardized trigger algorithm, the reasons for the observed era difference cannot be determined. The findings are exploratory and do not establish causal effects of NIRS or DPC use.
Authors
- Christian Hengstenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-2994)
- Anne‐Kristin Schaefer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-2461)
- Walter S. Speidl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-3138)
- Robert Zilberszac (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-6149)
- Thomas M. Hofbauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-6336)
- Bernhard Richter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1430-8159)
- Max Lenz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-994X)
- Julia Riebandt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8601-9989)
- Patrick Haider (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-5349)
- Andreas Gleiß (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8010-7665)
- Georg Gelbenegger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-7178)
- Daniel Nöstlinger
- Yalong Sun
- Gottfried Heinz
Institutions
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2026-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15176546
- Primary Topic
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00