Contradicting Epistemic Inequalities: The Case of the Journalist Navina Sundaram

This contribution asks how social inequalities are perpetuated through colonial silences maintained through practices of knowledge production in journalism. Drawing on postcolonial scholarship, it examines how these silences have historically been challenged between the 1960s and 1980s. Based on documents from the personal files of Navina Sundaram, one of the first non-White journalists on West German television, it traces the practices of contradicting that challenge and uphold journalistic epistemology: contradicting visibility in editorial practices, contradicting through international networks, and denying belonging. Together, these practices show how debates on diversity in German journalism are rooted in historical struggles for epistemic justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990261471550
Primary Topic
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contradicting Epistemic Inequalities: The Case of the Journalist Navina Sundaram

Margreth Lünenborg, Christina Haritos
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
article

Contradicting Epistemic Inequalities: The Case of the Journalist Navina Sundaram

Margreth Lünenborg, Christina Haritos
article en

Abstract

This contribution asks how social inequalities are perpetuated through colonial silences maintained through practices of knowledge production in journalism. Drawing on postcolonial scholarship, it examines how these silences have historically been challenged between the 1960s and 1980s. Based on documents from the personal files of Navina Sundaram, one of the first non-White journalists on West German television, it traces the practices of contradicting that challenge and uphold journalistic epistemology: contradicting visibility in editorial practices, contradicting through international networks, and denying belonging. Together, these practices show how debates on diversity in German journalism are rooted in historical struggles for epistemic justice.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.