A Hybrid Advanced Statistical Analysis and Decision Tree Algorithm Method for Power Transformer Fault Classification

Problems with power transformers reduce grid reliability and can lead to large financial losses. Traditional Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) methods, such as the Key Gas Method, Ratios, and Duval Triangle, often give unclear results when faults are complex or occur together. This study introduces a Statistically Guided Decision Tree (SGDT) framework, a combined approach that uses statistical DGA analysis and decision tree learning to identify transformer faults. This approach creates rule-based fault categories using advanced statistical analysis of real DGA data and tests how well these categories work with a Decision Tree model. Advanced statistical techniques such as dispersion and association metrics, confidence intervals, and distribution characteristics were used on a wide range of DGA records collected from a 275 kV transformer to define threshold values. Thereafter, fault classification rules were developed, and finally, a decision tree algorithm was developed to evaluate whether the gas concentration-based rules for fault labelling aligned with real data behaviour. The classification accuracy of 0.993 was achieved, indicating a high rate of correctly identified fault types. The F1-score, representing the harmonic mean of precision and recall, was 0.980, confirming both high precision and recall. Specifically, the recall was 0.980, meaning that 98% of real fault cases were correctly found, while the precision was 0.981, showing that 98.1% of predicted fault cases were correct. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.987, showing the model could clearly tell the difference between fault and non-fault cases. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of the current proposed SGDT framework, and this will help utilities that want to digitise their transformer maintenance and diagnostics for better decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19173986
Primary Topic
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Hybrid Advanced Statistical Analysis and Decision Tree Algorithm Method for Power Transformer Fault Classification

Bongumsa Mendu, Oluwafemi Emmanuel Oni, Omowunmi Mary Longe
Energies
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
article

A Hybrid Advanced Statistical Analysis and Decision Tree Algorithm Method for Power Transformer Fault Classification

Bongumsa Mendu, Oluwafemi Emmanuel Oni, Omowunmi Mary Longe
article en

Abstract

Problems with power transformers reduce grid reliability and can lead to large financial losses. Traditional Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) methods, such as the Key Gas Method, Ratios, and Duval Triangle, often give unclear results when faults are complex or occur together. This study introduces a Statistically Guided Decision Tree (SGDT) framework, a combined approach that uses statistical DGA analysis and decision tree learning to identify transformer faults. This approach creates rule-based fault categories using advanced statistical analysis of real DGA data and tests how well these categories work with a Decision Tree model. Advanced statistical techniques such as dispersion and association metrics, confidence intervals, and distribution characteristics were used on a wide range of DGA records collected from a 275 kV transformer to define threshold values. Thereafter, fault classification rules were developed, and finally, a decision tree algorithm was developed to evaluate whether the gas concentration-based rules for fault labelling aligned with real data behaviour. The classification accuracy of 0.993 was achieved, indicating a high rate of correctly identified fault types. The F1-score, representing the harmonic mean of precision and recall, was 0.980, confirming both high precision and recall. Specifically, the recall was 0.980, meaning that 98% of real fault cases were correctly found, while the precision was 0.981, showing that 98.1% of predicted fault cases were correct. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 0.987, showing the model could clearly tell the difference between fault and non-fault cases. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of the current proposed SGDT framework, and this will help utilities that want to digitise their transformer maintenance and diagnostics for better decision-making.

EnergiesVol. 19(17)
University of Zululand (ZA), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.