Encountering ‘Broken’ Public Services: Defiance and Disaffection at the Frontlines of the Democratic State

Abstract The apparently parlous state of public services in advanced liberal democracies has become a hot topic, nowhere more so than in ‘broken Britain’. Indeed, there is much debate in both politics scholarship and political rhetoric about the nature and causes of this decline, and its potential remedies. All perspectives are at pains to characterise everyday citizens as meek victims of failing public services. But this characterisation is too simplistic. Citizens do not always meekly accept what they are served: they can and often do exercise agency as they navigate and negotiate the frontline implementation of laws, policies, programmes and services. In this article, I reflect on what those forms of frontline agency entail, what they mean for how we understand the dynamics of democratic disaffection, and what that understanding means for how we might pursue democratic reform.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.70118
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encountering ‘Broken’ Public Services: Defiance and Disaffection at the Frontlines of the Democratic State

John Boswell
The Political Quarterly
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Encountering ‘Broken’ Public Services: Defiance and Disaffection at the Frontlines of the Democratic State

John Boswell
article en

Abstract

Abstract The apparently parlous state of public services in advanced liberal democracies has become a hot topic, nowhere more so than in ‘broken Britain’. Indeed, there is much debate in both politics scholarship and political rhetoric about the nature and causes of this decline, and its potential remedies. All perspectives are at pains to characterise everyday citizens as meek victims of failing public services. But this characterisation is too simplistic. Citizens do not always meekly accept what they are served: they can and often do exercise agency as they navigate and negotiate the frontline implementation of laws, policies, programmes and services. In this article, I reflect on what those forms of frontline agency entail, what they mean for how we understand the dynamics of democratic disaffection, and what that understanding means for how we might pursue democratic reform.

The Political Quarterly
Leverhulme Trust, University of Southampton
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.