Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters

Europe faces a health workforce crisis with nurses comprising the largest occupational group affected. International organisations argue that nurse retention should be the priority response. However, Europe lacks economic evidence to inform evidence-based action on retention. A research gap exists with regard to European studies that quantify nurse turnover costs, provide comparative cost data across countries, or evaluate the cost-effectiveness of retention initiatives. Other high-income countries have measured turnover costs, demonstrating both the feasibility of such analysis and the financial magnitude of the problem. Yet these findings cannot be transferred to European health systems due to differences in clinical practice, payment and other system characteristics, nurse skill-mix, and scope-of-practice. This Viewpoint addresses why turnover cost estimates from other regions cannot be applied to European health systems and what European hospital leaders, workforce planners, and policymakers could do with economic evidence they do not currently have. It calls for a European research agenda that prioritises comparative economic evidence on nurse retention to build the investment cases that decision-makers need. Economic evidence alone will not secure retention investments, but it is difficult to make the case for them without it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101822
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters

Carolin Gurisch, Marjorie Opuni, Margrieta Langins, Matthias Wismar et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters

Carolin Gurisch, Marjorie Opuni, Margrieta Langins, Matthias Wismar, Claudia B. Maier, Howard Catton, Julia Köppen
article en

Abstract

Europe faces a health workforce crisis with nurses comprising the largest occupational group affected. International organisations argue that nurse retention should be the priority response. However, Europe lacks economic evidence to inform evidence-based action on retention. A research gap exists with regard to European studies that quantify nurse turnover costs, provide comparative cost data across countries, or evaluate the cost-effectiveness of retention initiatives. Other high-income countries have measured turnover costs, demonstrating both the feasibility of such analysis and the financial magnitude of the problem. Yet these findings cannot be transferred to European health systems due to differences in clinical practice, payment and other system characteristics, nurse skill-mix, and scope-of-practice. This Viewpoint addresses why turnover cost estimates from other regions cannot be applied to European health systems and what European hospital leaders, workforce planners, and policymakers could do with economic evidence they do not currently have. It calls for a European research agenda that prioritises comparative economic evidence on nurse retention to build the investment cases that decision-makers need. Economic evidence alone will not secure retention investments, but it is difficult to make the case for them without it.

The Lancet Regional Health - EuropeVol. 69
European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (BE), International Council of Nurses (CH), Bielefeld University (DE), AGRIDEA (CH), World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (DK), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.