Key practices for ethical research during scientific expeditions

Abstract Scientific expeditions are crucial for creating new knowledge. The term itself carries strong colonial associations and a legacy of extractive practices. In many cases, expeditionary practices undermined local knowledge and expertise. Here, we advocate for a shift from “parachute science” towards collaborative approaches that incorporate diverse expertise, perspectives, languages, and knowledge systems, strengthening local capacities and focusing on developing and supporting ethical, long‐term partnerships. Building on recent publications that encourage a more equitable and respectful fieldwork environment, and drawing on our experiences, we synthesize some previously proposed practices and develop new ones. We reflect on and suggest best practices during scientific expeditions within research teams and in the team's interactions with different communities, from project planning and fieldwork to data management, publication, and outreach. By emphasizing transparency and mutual respect, this collaborative approach enhances scientific outcomes and the societal impact of research. Furthermore, the practices proposed here apply to any kind of fieldwork, not just scientific expeditions, making them valuable across diverse cultural, social, and environmental contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70379
Primary Topic
Polar Research and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key practices for ethical research during scientific expeditions

Carolina Soto-Vargas, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Jessica Díaz-Cárdenas, Andrés M. Cuervo et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Polar Research and Ecology
article

Key practices for ethical research during scientific expeditions

Carolina Soto-Vargas, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Jessica Díaz-Cárdenas, Andrés M. Cuervo, Nelsy Niño-Rodríguez, Andrés Sierra-Ricaurte, Carlos del Cairo, Camila Gómez, Daniel J. Mennill, Natalia Pérez‐Amaya, Juliana Soto‐Patiño, David Ocampo, Natalia Ocampo‐Peñuela
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scientific expeditions are crucial for creating new knowledge. The term itself carries strong colonial associations and a legacy of extractive practices. In many cases, expeditionary practices undermined local knowledge and expertise. Here, we advocate for a shift from “parachute science” towards collaborative approaches that incorporate diverse expertise, perspectives, languages, and knowledge systems, strengthening local capacities and focusing on developing and supporting ethical, long‐term partnerships. Building on recent publications that encourage a more equitable and respectful fieldwork environment, and drawing on our experiences, we synthesize some previously proposed practices and develop new ones. We reflect on and suggest best practices during scientific expeditions within research teams and in the team's interactions with different communities, from project planning and fieldwork to data management, publication, and outreach. By emphasizing transparency and mutual respect, this collaborative approach enhances scientific outcomes and the societal impact of research. Furthermore, the practices proposed here apply to any kind of fieldwork, not just scientific expeditions, making them valuable across diverse cultural, social, and environmental contexts.

Conservation Science and Practice
Universidad de Los Andes (CO), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), Princeton University (US), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO), Alexander von Humboldt Biological Resources Research Institute (CO), Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (US), Universidad de los Llanos (CO), Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), SELVA (CO), University of Windsor (CA)
National Geographic Society, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Polar Research and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.