Comparative Histopathological Effects of Intra-Articular Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Experimental Osteoarthritis

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in osteoarthritis (OA). Although several anti-VEGF agents are widely used in clinical practice, their comparative effects on osteoarthritic cartilage remain unclear. This study compared the histopathological effects of intra-articular bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in an experimental rat model of OA. Methods: Experimental OA was induced in 36 rats using anterior cruciate ligament transection. One month later, animals received two intra-articular injections of bevacizumab (2 mg/kg), ranibizumab (0.5 mg/kg), aflibercept (3.2 mg/kg), or saline at 3-week intervals. Histopathological evaluation was performed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grading and staging system by two blinded pathologists. The primary outcome was the total OARSI score. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn–Holm post hoc analysis. Results: Three animals were lost during anesthesia and surgical induction of OA before treatment allocation, leaving 33 rats for analysis. Significant overall differences were observed among the groups for the primary outcome of total OARSI score (p = 0.026) and the secondary outcomes of OARSI grade (p = 0.042) and OARSI stage (p = 0.019). Ranibizumab demonstrated numerically lower OARSI grade and total scores than the control group, whereas both groups had the same median OARSI stage score. Bevacizumab showed numerically lower OARSI grade and total scores than the control group but a slightly higher median stage score. Pairwise analysis showed significantly lower OARSI stage and total OARSI scores in the ranibizumab group than in the aflibercept group, whereas no significant differences were observed between any treatment group and the control group after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Anti-VEGF agents demonstrated differential histopathological responses in experimental OA. Although no treatment significantly improved histopathological outcomes compared with the control group after adjustment for multiple comparisons, ranibizumab showed lower OARSI stage and total scores than aflibercept. These findings indicate that the evaluated anti-VEGF agents may not exert equivalent biological effects and warrant further investigation in adequately powered experimental studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15176565
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Histopathological Effects of Intra-Articular Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Experimental Osteoarthritis

Mücahit Çelik, Mehmet Arıcan, Zekeriya Okan Karaduman, Sönmez Sağlam et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Comparative Histopathological Effects of Intra-Articular Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Experimental Osteoarthritis

Mücahit Çelik, Mehmet Arıcan, Zekeriya Okan Karaduman, Sönmez Sağlam, Mücahid Osman Yücel, Fatih Demir, Raşit Emin Dalaslan
article en

Abstract

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has emerged as a potential therapeutic target in osteoarthritis (OA). Although several anti-VEGF agents are widely used in clinical practice, their comparative effects on osteoarthritic cartilage remain unclear. This study compared the histopathological effects of intra-articular bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept in an experimental rat model of OA. Methods: Experimental OA was induced in 36 rats using anterior cruciate ligament transection. One month later, animals received two intra-articular injections of bevacizumab (2 mg/kg), ranibizumab (0.5 mg/kg), aflibercept (3.2 mg/kg), or saline at 3-week intervals. Histopathological evaluation was performed using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grading and staging system by two blinded pathologists. The primary outcome was the total OARSI score. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn–Holm post hoc analysis. Results: Three animals were lost during anesthesia and surgical induction of OA before treatment allocation, leaving 33 rats for analysis. Significant overall differences were observed among the groups for the primary outcome of total OARSI score (p = 0.026) and the secondary outcomes of OARSI grade (p = 0.042) and OARSI stage (p = 0.019). Ranibizumab demonstrated numerically lower OARSI grade and total scores than the control group, whereas both groups had the same median OARSI stage score. Bevacizumab showed numerically lower OARSI grade and total scores than the control group but a slightly higher median stage score. Pairwise analysis showed significantly lower OARSI stage and total OARSI scores in the ranibizumab group than in the aflibercept group, whereas no significant differences were observed between any treatment group and the control group after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Anti-VEGF agents demonstrated differential histopathological responses in experimental OA. Although no treatment significantly improved histopathological outcomes compared with the control group after adjustment for multiple comparisons, ranibizumab showed lower OARSI stage and total scores than aflibercept. These findings indicate that the evaluated anti-VEGF agents may not exert equivalent biological effects and warrant further investigation in adequately powered experimental studies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(17)
Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Düzce Üniversitesi (TR)
Düzce Üniversitesi
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.