Multi-Criteria, Time-Based Performance Evaluation of Facade Systems under Circular Design Principles: A Pilot Study

This study introduces a pilot framework for evaluating two facade systems under circular design principles, integrating multi-criteria and time-based assessments. The framework assesses cost, environmental impact, and life cycle assessment (LCA) performance over a 30-year building lifecycle, including maintenance and material recovery potential. Facade A (aluminum panel) and Facade B (timber-based modular system) are compared using a simplified scoring approach. Results indicate that timber-based facades outperform aluminum in environmental and LCA metrics, while cost differences are minimal. The pilot framework demonstrates a practical tool for early-stage design decision-making, highlighting key trade-offs between economic and environmental objectives. This study is intended as a pilot and exploratory application rather than a comprehensive quantitative assessment. Findings suggest that simplified multi-criteria and time-based evaluations can support architects in implementing circular design principles in facade selection, providing a foundation for more comprehensive assessments in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67288/jah.1863217
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-Criteria, Time-Based Performance Evaluation of Facade Systems under Circular Design Principles: A Pilot Study

Ebru Alakavuk, Gizem Nur Gültepe
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Multi-Criteria, Time-Based Performance Evaluation of Facade Systems under Circular Design Principles: A Pilot Study

Ebru Alakavuk, Gizem Nur Gültepe
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a pilot framework for evaluating two facade systems under circular design principles, integrating multi-criteria and time-based assessments. The framework assesses cost, environmental impact, and life cycle assessment (LCA) performance over a 30-year building lifecycle, including maintenance and material recovery potential. Facade A (aluminum panel) and Facade B (timber-based modular system) are compared using a simplified scoring approach. Results indicate that timber-based facades outperform aluminum in environmental and LCA metrics, while cost differences are minimal. The pilot framework demonstrates a practical tool for early-stage design decision-making, highlighting key trade-offs between economic and environmental objectives. This study is intended as a pilot and exploratory application rather than a comprehensive quantitative assessment. Findings suggest that simplified multi-criteria and time-based evaluations can support architects in implementing circular design principles in facade selection, providing a foundation for more comprehensive assessments in future research.

Vol. 5(2)
Yaşar University (TR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-Criteria, Time-Based Performance Evaluation of Facade Systems under Circular Design Principles: A Pilot Study — Ebru Alakavuk, Gizem Nur Gültepe · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS