Psychometric validity evidence for a measure of trust in U.S. public health actors for vaccine information

PURPOSE: Generate psychometric validity evidence for a novel 4-item measure of trust in public health actors for vaccine information for use in U.S.-population survey research. METHODS: We analyzed data from 7394 respondents in U.S.-nationally representative KFF public opinion surveys over five time points (2020-2025) regarding their level of trust in FDA, CDC, their local public health department, and their own doctor to provide reliable vaccine information. We used classical test theory to estimate internal consistency reliability and parallel analysis to evaluate dimensionality of the proposed measure. We fit an Item Response Theory graded response model to discern item and scale properties, and estimated differential test functioning (DTF) by political identity and time point. We estimated associations between scale scores and vaccine-related outcomes, and compared scale scores between groups of differing partisanship and vaccination status. RESULTS: The 4-item scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and a single underlying dimension ("trust in public health actors for vaccine information"). IRT suggested items provided sufficient information (a parameters: 1.55-4.04) across a wide range of latent trust levels (b parameters: -2.62-0.69). We did not find substantively meaningful DTF by political partisanship or survey time point at the scale level. Higher scale scores were positively associated with vaccine uptake and pro-vaccine attitudes, including COVID, flu, and MMR vaccine confidence (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: This public Health Actor Trust for Information about Vaccines (HAT-IV) scale had strong psychometric properties and associations with vaccine-related attitudinal and behavioral outcomes across U.S political and public health contexts. Scale functioning was robust across political identity and time point differences. HAT-IV provides a short, informative way to measure individuals' trust in U.S. public health actors for vaccine information in survey research. This scale can be administered to study relationships between trust, key public health actors, and vaccine outcomes in the U.S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccine
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129026
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validity evidence for a measure of trust in U.S. public health actors for vaccine information

Amanda M. Gutierrez, Matthew Motta, My H. Do
Vaccine
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Psychometric validity evidence for a measure of trust in U.S. public health actors for vaccine information

Amanda M. Gutierrez, Matthew Motta, My H. Do
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Generate psychometric validity evidence for a novel 4-item measure of trust in public health actors for vaccine information for use in U.S.-population survey research. METHODS: We analyzed data from 7394 respondents in U.S.-nationally representative KFF public opinion surveys over five time points (2020-2025) regarding their level of trust in FDA, CDC, their local public health department, and their own doctor to provide reliable vaccine information. We used classical test theory to estimate internal consistency reliability and parallel analysis to evaluate dimensionality of the proposed measure. We fit an Item Response Theory graded response model to discern item and scale properties, and estimated differential test functioning (DTF) by political identity and time point. We estimated associations between scale scores and vaccine-related outcomes, and compared scale scores between groups of differing partisanship and vaccination status. RESULTS: The 4-item scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.84) and a single underlying dimension ("trust in public health actors for vaccine information"). IRT suggested items provided sufficient information (a parameters: 1.55-4.04) across a wide range of latent trust levels (b parameters: -2.62-0.69). We did not find substantively meaningful DTF by political partisanship or survey time point at the scale level. Higher scale scores were positively associated with vaccine uptake and pro-vaccine attitudes, including COVID, flu, and MMR vaccine confidence (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: This public Health Actor Trust for Information about Vaccines (HAT-IV) scale had strong psychometric properties and associations with vaccine-related attitudinal and behavioral outcomes across U.S political and public health contexts. Scale functioning was robust across political identity and time point differences. HAT-IV provides a short, informative way to measure individuals' trust in U.S. public health actors for vaccine information in survey research. This scale can be administered to study relationships between trust, key public health actors, and vaccine outcomes in the U.S.

VaccineVol. 91
Boston University (US), Harvard University (US), Harvard University Press (US)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.