A Systematic Review of Research on Tacit Knowledge in Korea

This study analyzed research trends based on 158 academic journal papers (1998–2026.06) on domestic tacit knowledge research, selected through a PRISMA-based systematic review of the RISS database. The purpose is to identify the overall landscape of domestic tacit knowledge research, summarize patterns of theoretical framework utilization, and propose future research directions through content analysis. Results show that research is most heavily concentrated in fields outside business and education—such as martial arts and physical education—followed by pedagogy and business administration, with AI-related research increasing markedly since 2020. Nonaka's SECI model remains the most widely utilized theoretical framework, but its dominance is declining, while Embodied Cognition theory and reinterpretations of Polanyi's original texts are steadily gaining ground. Findings are classified into six categories: conceptual/theoretical frameworks, transfer/sharing conditions and barriers, acquisition and internalization processes, organizational performance linkage, AI/digital integration, and practical tools/systems. Three historical phases are identified: introduction (~2004), multi-disciplinary expansion (2005–2019), and AI/digital integration (2020–). This study contributes theoretically by providing the first empirical evidence of a paradigm shift in domestic tacit knowledge research—from SECI-model dependency toward embodied-cognition and original-Polanyi-based reinterpretation—thereby offering an evidence-based diagnostic map for the field's theoretical diversification, and proposes future directions including mixed-methods designs and Korean contextualization.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13000/jfmse.2026.8.38.4.828
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review of Research on Tacit Knowledge in Korea

Soon-An HYUN
Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education
Educational Systems and Policies
article

A Systematic Review of Research on Tacit Knowledge in Korea

Soon-An HYUN
article en

Abstract

This study analyzed research trends based on 158 academic journal papers (1998–2026.06) on domestic tacit knowledge research, selected through a PRISMA-based systematic review of the RISS database. The purpose is to identify the overall landscape of domestic tacit knowledge research, summarize patterns of theoretical framework utilization, and propose future research directions through content analysis. Results show that research is most heavily concentrated in fields outside business and education—such as martial arts and physical education—followed by pedagogy and business administration, with AI-related research increasing markedly since 2020. Nonaka's SECI model remains the most widely utilized theoretical framework, but its dominance is declining, while Embodied Cognition theory and reinterpretations of Polanyi's original texts are steadily gaining ground. Findings are classified into six categories: conceptual/theoretical frameworks, transfer/sharing conditions and barriers, acquisition and internalization processes, organizational performance linkage, AI/digital integration, and practical tools/systems. Three historical phases are identified: introduction (~2004), multi-disciplinary expansion (2005–2019), and AI/digital integration (2020–). This study contributes theoretically by providing the first empirical evidence of a paradigm shift in domestic tacit knowledge research—from SECI-model dependency toward embodied-cognition and original-Polanyi-based reinterpretation—thereby offering an evidence-based diagnostic map for the field's theoretical diversification, and proposes future directions including mixed-methods designs and Korean contextualization.

Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences EducationVol. 38(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.