Evaluating the use of proactive surveillance and remote patient monitoring to guide the timing of valve intervention in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (APRAISE-AS): results of a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The insidious nature of aortic stenosis (AS) combined with the advanced age of the affected population results in underreporting of symptoms and underestimation of impact on functional capacity and quality of life. Although guidelines recommend early valve replacement in severe asymptomatic AS when coupled with adverse prognostic features, capacity within healthcare systems may limit translation into clinical practice. The use of remote monitoring and proactive surveillance to inform clinical management of heart valve disease is an underexplored area. APRAISE-AS evaluated the utility of remote monitoring to pre-empt/detect a change in clinical status (incorporating a symptom tracker, frailty assessment and quality of life score) to inform patient management. METHODS: 12-month open-label, two-arm, parallel group randomised controlled pilot trial conducted in two tertiary cardiac centres. 38/66 participants (≥18 years) with asymptomatic severe AS were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard care or the APRAISE-AS intervention in addition to standard care. The primary aim of the study was to (1) test the trial protocol, (2) determine acceptability of the APRAISE-AS intervention and (3) inform the most appropriate outcome measure(s) and sample size for a full-scale randomised controlled trial. RESULTS: 38 participants were assigned to standard care (n=19) or to standard care plus the APRAISE-AS intervention (n=19). Adherence rates were high: 81% for the weekly symptom assessments, 91% for the fortnightly timed up and go tests and 93% for the monthly health-related quality of life assessments using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Clinical review and onward referral for valve replacement were triggered by a change from baseline in symptoms and KCCQ scores. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring of severe asymptomatic AS can be safely delivered in practice. Although the pilot did not recruit to target, a digitally enabled clinical pathway to optimise the management of asymptomatic severe AS is acceptable to clinicians and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19413194.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2026-327782
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating the use of proactive surveillance and remote patient monitoring to guide the timing of valve intervention in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (APRAISE-AS): results of a pilot randomised controlled trial

Yongzhong Sun, James Cotton, Richard P. Steeds, Larissa Fabritz et al.
Heart
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Evaluating the use of proactive surveillance and remote patient monitoring to guide the timing of valve intervention in patients with severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis (APRAISE-AS): results of a pilot randomised controlled trial

Yongzhong Sun, James Cotton, Richard P. Steeds, Larissa Fabritz, Nazish Khan, Mary Nulty, Phil Collis, Derek Kyte, Clive Stubbs, Samir Mehta
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The insidious nature of aortic stenosis (AS) combined with the advanced age of the affected population results in underreporting of symptoms and underestimation of impact on functional capacity and quality of life. Although guidelines recommend early valve replacement in severe asymptomatic AS when coupled with adverse prognostic features, capacity within healthcare systems may limit translation into clinical practice. The use of remote monitoring and proactive surveillance to inform clinical management of heart valve disease is an underexplored area. APRAISE-AS evaluated the utility of remote monitoring to pre-empt/detect a change in clinical status (incorporating a symptom tracker, frailty assessment and quality of life score) to inform patient management. METHODS: 12-month open-label, two-arm, parallel group randomised controlled pilot trial conducted in two tertiary cardiac centres. 38/66 participants (≥18 years) with asymptomatic severe AS were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard care or the APRAISE-AS intervention in addition to standard care. The primary aim of the study was to (1) test the trial protocol, (2) determine acceptability of the APRAISE-AS intervention and (3) inform the most appropriate outcome measure(s) and sample size for a full-scale randomised controlled trial. RESULTS: 38 participants were assigned to standard care (n=19) or to standard care plus the APRAISE-AS intervention (n=19). Adherence rates were high: 81% for the weekly symptom assessments, 91% for the fortnightly timed up and go tests and 93% for the monthly health-related quality of life assessments using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Clinical review and onward referral for valve replacement were triggered by a change from baseline in symptoms and KCCQ scores. CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring of severe asymptomatic AS can be safely delivered in practice. Although the pilot did not recruit to target, a digitally enabled clinical pathway to optimise the management of asymptomatic severe AS is acceptable to clinicians and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19413194.

Heart
University of Wolverhampton (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Birmingham Dental Hospital (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB), Wolverhampton Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Worcester (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.