Teaching English as a (White) right: Transnational Whiteness in Korean elementary education

This critical ethnographic study examines how transnational Whiteness is institutionalised in South Korean elementary English education through policy, curriculum, and teacher beliefs. Drawing on Critical Whiteness Studies and raciolinguistics, it conceptualises Whiteness as a glocalised apparatus of power that privileges White Western varieties of English in English Language Teaching (ELT). Data include classroom observations at two public schools, interviews with seven Korean elementary teachers, and policy document. Findings reveal that transnational Whiteness operates through belonging, qualification, and authority, shaping who English is imagined to belong to, who is qualified to teach it, and who can define legitimate linguistic standards. Rather than being externally imposed, these hierarchies are translated into local educational practices and normalised through everyday pedagogical decisions. This recursive processglocalises global hierarchies of linguistic legitimacy and reproduces them as educational common sense. The study demonstrates how Whiteness can be sustained without White bodies, as non-White actors reproduce dominant forms of linguistic legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Whiteness and Education
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23793406.2026.2723731
Primary Topic
Multilingual Education and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching English as a (White) right: Transnational Whiteness in Korean elementary education

Gayoung Choi
Whiteness and Education
Multilingual Education and Policy
article

Teaching English as a (White) right: Transnational Whiteness in Korean elementary education

Gayoung Choi
article en

Abstract

This critical ethnographic study examines how transnational Whiteness is institutionalised in South Korean elementary English education through policy, curriculum, and teacher beliefs. Drawing on Critical Whiteness Studies and raciolinguistics, it conceptualises Whiteness as a glocalised apparatus of power that privileges White Western varieties of English in English Language Teaching (ELT). Data include classroom observations at two public schools, interviews with seven Korean elementary teachers, and policy document. Findings reveal that transnational Whiteness operates through belonging, qualification, and authority, shaping who English is imagined to belong to, who is qualified to teach it, and who can define legitimate linguistic standards. Rather than being externally imposed, these hierarchies are translated into local educational practices and normalised through everyday pedagogical decisions. This recursive processglocalises global hierarchies of linguistic legitimacy and reproduces them as educational common sense. The study demonstrates how Whiteness can be sustained without White bodies, as non-White actors reproduce dominant forms of linguistic legitimacy.

Whiteness and Education
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Multilingual Education and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Teaching English as a (White) right: Transnational Whiteness in Korean elementary education — Gayoung Choi · Whiteness and Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS