Balancing matrices with both positive and negative entries: a generalized cross-entropy solution

This paper presents a matrix balancing technique based on Generalized Cross-Entropy (GCE) that can be suitable for matrices containing both positive and negative entries. One comparative advantage of the technique presented here is that it allows for the incorporation of inference into the estimates. An additional advantage is that this technique makes possible sign flips in the cells of the initial and the estimated matrices, which can be something desirable in situations where assuming sign-preservation for all the entries of the matrix could be too restrictive. A simple illustrative example shows how GCE works when adjusting a matrix characterized by having positive and negative entries within a Supply and Use Tables (SUT) framework, producing comparatively better indicators of error than other adjusting techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Systems Research
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2026.2710608
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing matrices with both positive and negative entries: a generalized cross-entropy solution

Esteban Fernández Vázquez
Economic Systems Research
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Balancing matrices with both positive and negative entries: a generalized cross-entropy solution

Esteban Fernández Vázquez
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a matrix balancing technique based on Generalized Cross-Entropy (GCE) that can be suitable for matrices containing both positive and negative entries. One comparative advantage of the technique presented here is that it allows for the incorporation of inference into the estimates. An additional advantage is that this technique makes possible sign flips in the cells of the initial and the estimated matrices, which can be something desirable in situations where assuming sign-preservation for all the entries of the matrix could be too restrictive. A simple illustrative example shows how GCE works when adjusting a matrix characterized by having positive and negative entries within a Supply and Use Tables (SUT) framework, producing comparatively better indicators of error than other adjusting techniques.

Economic Systems Research
Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.