Debiased perturbational complexity peaks at the edge of chaos: reproducible response dimensionality in recurrent networks

The perturbational complexity index (PCIst) is the most clinically validated readout of consciousness-related brain complexity, yet what dynamical property it tracks has remained unclear. Using a fully out-of-sample variant of the index (PCIst-XV) that removes its selection biases (companion paper), paired sham controls, and conditional Lyapunov exponents λ, we characterize perturbational complexity across 366 recurrent networks spanning ordered, edge-of-chaos and chaotic regimes, in two connectivity families (Gaussian echo-state and Dale's-law E/I). Debiased complexity Δ follows an inverted-U in λ: near-floor in deeply ordered networks (median 11), maximal at |λ| < 0.01 (median 94), and collapsing in chaos (median 5; edge vs order p = 1.8×10⁻³, edge vs chaos p = 5.9×10⁻³; trend on the ordered side Spearman ρ = 0.56, p = 5.5×10⁻⁶, n = 92 networks). The decay into chaos is gradual, not step-like (preregistered step test rejected), consistent with a divergence-horizon account: reproducible response structure survives for ~1/λ steps within the measurement window. Three controls sharpen the interpretation. (i) Within nominally identical networks, Δ tracks each network's measured λ, not its construction parameter — tanh networks with spectral radius 1.0–1.5 self-organize to λ ≈ 0, an effective-criticality regime. (ii) Response energy does not explain the effect (Spearman(Δ, energy) = 0.06, p = 0.72; the edge peak survives energy residualization at p = 7.9×10⁻⁶): deeply ordered networks respond strongly but simply. (iii) The quantity that does explain Δ is the response's reproducible dimensionality (R-dim): the number of principal response directions that replicate across independent trial halves (Spearman ρ = 0.74, p = 2.1×10⁻¹¹), which itself traces the same inverted-U (median R-dim 1.4 → 6.2 → 0.4 across order → edge → chaos). A stereotyped excitable network reproducing the slow-wave response of the unconscious brain sits at the floor (Δ = 8.5) despite maximal response energy and reliability, because its response is two-dimensional. We propose that perturbational complexity measures reproducible causal dimensionality — a property requiring simultaneous sensitivity (lost in order) and stability (lost in chaos) — and is therefore maximal only at the edge of chaos approached from the stable side. The ordered-to-edge rise and the R-dim relationship replicate in Dale's-law E/I networks (edge vs order p = 8.6×10⁻⁴; ρ = 0.54), where E/I balance itself prevents deep chaos — an incidental observation consistent with cortical dynamics living near, and stabilized short of, the edge.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22100827
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Debiased perturbational complexity peaks at the edge of chaos: reproducible response dimensionality in recurrent networks

Nicolás Federico Galindez
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
preprint

Debiased perturbational complexity peaks at the edge of chaos: reproducible response dimensionality in recurrent networks

Nicolás Federico Galindez
preprint en

Abstract

The perturbational complexity index (PCIst) is the most clinically validated readout of consciousness-related brain complexity, yet what dynamical property it tracks has remained unclear. Using a fully out-of-sample variant of the index (PCIst-XV) that removes its selection biases (companion paper), paired sham controls, and conditional Lyapunov exponents λ, we characterize perturbational complexity across 366 recurrent networks spanning ordered, edge-of-chaos and chaotic regimes, in two connectivity families (Gaussian echo-state and Dale's-law E/I). Debiased complexity Δ follows an inverted-U in λ: near-floor in deeply ordered networks (median 11), maximal at |λ| < 0.01 (median 94), and collapsing in chaos (median 5; edge vs order p = 1.8×10⁻³, edge vs chaos p = 5.9×10⁻³; trend on the ordered side Spearman ρ = 0.56, p = 5.5×10⁻⁶, n = 92 networks). The decay into chaos is gradual, not step-like (preregistered step test rejected), consistent with a divergence-horizon account: reproducible response structure survives for ~1/λ steps within the measurement window. Three controls sharpen the interpretation. (i) Within nominally identical networks, Δ tracks each network's measured λ, not its construction parameter — tanh networks with spectral radius 1.0–1.5 self-organize to λ ≈ 0, an effective-criticality regime. (ii) Response energy does not explain the effect (Spearman(Δ, energy) = 0.06, p = 0.72; the edge peak survives energy residualization at p = 7.9×10⁻⁶): deeply ordered networks respond strongly but simply. (iii) The quantity that does explain Δ is the response's reproducible dimensionality (R-dim): the number of principal response directions that replicate across independent trial halves (Spearman ρ = 0.74, p = 2.1×10⁻¹¹), which itself traces the same inverted-U (median R-dim 1.4 → 6.2 → 0.4 across order → edge → chaos). A stereotyped excitable network reproducing the slow-wave response of the unconscious brain sits at the floor (Δ = 8.5) despite maximal response energy and reliability, because its response is two-dimensional. We propose that perturbational complexity measures reproducible causal dimensionality — a property requiring simultaneous sensitivity (lost in order) and stability (lost in chaos) — and is therefore maximal only at the edge of chaos approached from the stable side. The ordered-to-edge rise and the R-dim relationship replicate in Dale's-law E/I networks (edge vs order p = 8.6×10⁻⁴; ρ = 0.54), where E/I balance itself prevents deep chaos — an incidental observation consistent with cortical dynamics living near, and stabilized short of, the edge.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.