How technological development generates strategic advantage and how the gaps in the process can be weaponized: Implication for the U.S.-China rivalry

Leading-edge technologies have risen to the mainstage of great power competition, yet how technological development translates into strategic advantage remains both understudied and undertheorized. Scholarship is skewed toward innovation ecosystems and -races, at the expense of institutional setup, productization and deployment. I address this gap with a six-phase framework systematizing the process from innovation to strategic advantage. I identify critical gaps at each phase—drawing on literature of their respective fields of science—and provide examples where these caused multi-year delays or altogether prevented strategic gain. Drawing from Chinese scholarly literature, I then apply the framework to China’s efforts to generate strategic advantage from technological development and discuss the U.S.’ opportunities to weaponize them to impede China’s effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Strategy
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2701166
Primary Topic
Herbal Medicine and Trade Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How technological development generates strategic advantage and how the gaps in the process can be weaponized: Implication for the U.S.-China rivalry

Markus Holmgren
Comparative Strategy
Herbal Medicine and Trade Cooperation
article

How technological development generates strategic advantage and how the gaps in the process can be weaponized: Implication for the U.S.-China rivalry

Markus Holmgren
article en

Abstract

Leading-edge technologies have risen to the mainstage of great power competition, yet how technological development translates into strategic advantage remains both understudied and undertheorized. Scholarship is skewed toward innovation ecosystems and -races, at the expense of institutional setup, productization and deployment. I address this gap with a six-phase framework systematizing the process from innovation to strategic advantage. I identify critical gaps at each phase—drawing on literature of their respective fields of science—and provide examples where these caused multi-year delays or altogether prevented strategic gain. Drawing from Chinese scholarly literature, I then apply the framework to China’s efforts to generate strategic advantage from technological development and discuss the U.S.’ opportunities to weaponize them to impede China’s effectiveness.

Comparative Strategy
Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FI)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Herbal Medicine and Trade Cooperation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How technological development generates strategic advantage and how the gaps in the process can be weaponized: Implication for the U.S.-China rivalry — Markus Holmgren · Comparative Strategy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS