Computational Models for Bilingual Aphasia: A Systematic Review of Language Deficit Research with a Focus on Code-Switching and Translation

This systematic review synthesises computational models of language deficits in bilingual aphasia, focusing on code-switching and translation. Per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this study identified 42 publications (2010–2025). Of the three deficit types, lexical retrieval and naming deficit simulations are most mature, replicating naming errors and predicting cross-language generalisation. Code-switching and translation deficit modelling is extremely limited: only a single computational lesioning study has addressed both through mechanistic simulation. Machine learning methods show preliminary promise for predicting treatment outcomes but remain largely data-driven. Three key challenges emerge: (1) methodological fragmentation—heterogeneous model types, lesion implementations, and evaluation metrics, with no standardised quantitative validation; (2) an underdeveloped theoretical foundation, as most studies are confined to behavioural fitting rather than testing hypotheses on impaired language control via computational lesions; (3) limited clinical translation, with few predictive studies integrating longitudinal patient data, with approximately 70% of studies concentrated in North America/Western Europe and biased toward English–Spanish bilinguals, limiting theoretical generalisability. Future work should shift from behavioural fitting to explainable mechanistic simulation, develop predictive frameworks for personalised rehabilitation, and establish standardised protocols bridging computational modelling with clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091486
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Models for Bilingual Aphasia: A Systematic Review of Language Deficit Research with a Focus on Code-Switching and Translation

Si Chen, Ruilan Cao, Sijia Cheng
Behavioral Sciences
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Computational Models for Bilingual Aphasia: A Systematic Review of Language Deficit Research with a Focus on Code-Switching and Translation

Si Chen, Ruilan Cao, Sijia Cheng
article en

Abstract

This systematic review synthesises computational models of language deficits in bilingual aphasia, focusing on code-switching and translation. Per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this study identified 42 publications (2010–2025). Of the three deficit types, lexical retrieval and naming deficit simulations are most mature, replicating naming errors and predicting cross-language generalisation. Code-switching and translation deficit modelling is extremely limited: only a single computational lesioning study has addressed both through mechanistic simulation. Machine learning methods show preliminary promise for predicting treatment outcomes but remain largely data-driven. Three key challenges emerge: (1) methodological fragmentation—heterogeneous model types, lesion implementations, and evaluation metrics, with no standardised quantitative validation; (2) an underdeveloped theoretical foundation, as most studies are confined to behavioural fitting rather than testing hypotheses on impaired language control via computational lesions; (3) limited clinical translation, with few predictive studies integrating longitudinal patient data, with approximately 70% of studies concentrated in North America/Western Europe and biased toward English–Spanish bilinguals, limiting theoretical generalisability. Future work should shift from behavioural fitting to explainable mechanistic simulation, develop predictive frameworks for personalised rehabilitation, and establish standardised protocols bridging computational modelling with clinical application.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(9)
Anhui University of Technology (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.