Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Fibular Artery Septocutaneous Perforators

Background: Reliable identification of septocutaneous fibular artery perforators is important for free fibula flap harvest involving a skin paddle. While imaging modalities such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) provide high diagnostic accuracy for direct perforator visualization, they do not quantify segment-level probability of perforator presence based on global anatomical characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective CTA-based study, 246 patients (490 limbs) were analyzed. Each fibula was divided into 10 equal segments, yielding 4,900 limb-zone observations. Using limb-level anatomical and vascular parameters, machine learning models were developed to predict the presence of at least one perforator per segment. Data were split at the patient level (80% training, 20% testing). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC), and Brier score. Results: Overall segment-level perforator prevalence was 15.4%, and 20.6% of limbs exhibited no septocutaneous perforator. Ridge-regularized logistic regression (primary model) achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.684, PR-AUC of 0.243, and Brier score of 0.1214. Random forest achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.705, PR-AUC of 0.239, and Brier score of 0.1216. XGBoost achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.710, PR-AUC of 0.245, and Brier score of 0.1213. The generalized additive model yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.683, PR-AUC of 0.231, and Brier score of 0.1223. All approaches reproduced the characteristic midfibular peak in perforator probability. Conclusion: Machine learning enables moderate segment-level discrimination of perforator presence based on global anatomical features. While not comparable to imaging for direct vessel localization, probabilistic modeling may complement imaging by providing structured, patient-specific estimation of regional perforator likelihood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2936-1847
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Fibular Artery Septocutaneous Perforators

Johannes Brandt, Lucas M. Ritschl, Yannik Leonhardt, Nils Krautkremer et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Fibular Artery Septocutaneous Perforators

Johannes Brandt, Lucas M. Ritschl, Yannik Leonhardt, Nils Krautkremer, Jonathan Mohr, Andreas Fichter, Jannik Ketschau
article en

Abstract

Background: Reliable identification of septocutaneous fibular artery perforators is important for free fibula flap harvest involving a skin paddle. While imaging modalities such as computed tomography angiography (CTA) provide high diagnostic accuracy for direct perforator visualization, they do not quantify segment-level probability of perforator presence based on global anatomical characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective CTA-based study, 246 patients (490 limbs) were analyzed. Each fibula was divided into 10 equal segments, yielding 4,900 limb-zone observations. Using limb-level anatomical and vascular parameters, machine learning models were developed to predict the presence of at least one perforator per segment. Data were split at the patient level (80% training, 20% testing). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC), and Brier score. Results: Overall segment-level perforator prevalence was 15.4%, and 20.6% of limbs exhibited no septocutaneous perforator. Ridge-regularized logistic regression (primary model) achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.684, PR-AUC of 0.243, and Brier score of 0.1214. Random forest achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.705, PR-AUC of 0.239, and Brier score of 0.1216. XGBoost achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.710, PR-AUC of 0.245, and Brier score of 0.1213. The generalized additive model yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.683, PR-AUC of 0.231, and Brier score of 0.1223. All approaches reproduced the characteristic midfibular peak in perforator probability. Conclusion: Machine learning enables moderate segment-level discrimination of perforator presence based on global anatomical features. While not comparable to imaging for direct vessel localization, probabilistic modeling may complement imaging by providing structured, patient-specific estimation of regional perforator likelihood.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
TUM Klinikum (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.