Efficacy and safety profile of multi-depth microfocused ultrasound and microneedle radiofrequency for facial tightening: a prospective split-face randomized trial

Microfocused ultrasound (MFUS) and microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) are widely used for nonsurgical facial tightening, yet single-session outcomes remain variable. This evaluator-blinded, prospective, split-face randomized trial assessed volumetric, ultrasound-derived, skin-quality, and safety outcomes after single-session MFUS, MRF, or combined MFUS + MRF treatment. Thirty participants received one randomized hemiface intervention, with standardized photography, three-dimensional volumetric imaging, high-frequency ultrasound, VISIA skin analysis, and adverse-event monitoring during follow-up. MFUS + MRF produced earlier and greater mandibular volume reduction at 1 month (mean change, − 2.34 mL; 95% CI − 3.63 to − 1.04) than MFUS (− 0.39 mL; 95% CI − 1.34 to 0.55) or MRF (0.05 mL; 95% CI − 0.47 to 0.56; both adjusted P < 0.05). At 3 and 6 months, reductions remained numerically greater after MFUS + MRF (− 2.48 and − 2.66 mL) than after MRF (− 1.44 and − 1.23 mL) and were similar to MFUS (− 2.46 and − 2.28 mL). In this early-phase study, MFUS combined with MRF resulted in more rapid and greater lower-face contour changes than either modality alone; however, MFUS-containing treatments were associated with higher rates of transient paresthesia and rare transient motor weakness, underscoring the need for cautious parameter optimization. Adequately powered studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm durability and define the optimal efficacy–safety balance. Clinical trial registration : This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) under the registration number ChiCTR2400087490 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=227608 ), and was first posted on 29/07/2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-66690-z
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety profile of multi-depth microfocused ultrasound and microneedle radiofrequency for facial tightening: a prospective split-face randomized trial

Dongze Lyu, Jiafang Zhu, Li Huang, Xiaoxi Lin et al.
Scientific Reports
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
article

Efficacy and safety profile of multi-depth microfocused ultrasound and microneedle radiofrequency for facial tightening: a prospective split-face randomized trial

Dongze Lyu, Jiafang Zhu, Li Huang, Xiaoxi Lin, Yue Han, Wei Fang, Rui Chang, Zhen Zhang, Wenxin Yu, Xianglei Wu, Ying Shang, Wei Gao, Lingyue Shen
article en

Abstract

Microfocused ultrasound (MFUS) and microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) are widely used for nonsurgical facial tightening, yet single-session outcomes remain variable. This evaluator-blinded, prospective, split-face randomized trial assessed volumetric, ultrasound-derived, skin-quality, and safety outcomes after single-session MFUS, MRF, or combined MFUS + MRF treatment. Thirty participants received one randomized hemiface intervention, with standardized photography, three-dimensional volumetric imaging, high-frequency ultrasound, VISIA skin analysis, and adverse-event monitoring during follow-up. MFUS + MRF produced earlier and greater mandibular volume reduction at 1 month (mean change, − 2.34 mL; 95% CI − 3.63 to − 1.04) than MFUS (− 0.39 mL; 95% CI − 1.34 to 0.55) or MRF (0.05 mL; 95% CI − 0.47 to 0.56; both adjusted P < 0.05). At 3 and 6 months, reductions remained numerically greater after MFUS + MRF (− 2.48 and − 2.66 mL) than after MRF (− 1.44 and − 1.23 mL) and were similar to MFUS (− 2.46 and − 2.28 mL). In this early-phase study, MFUS combined with MRF resulted in more rapid and greater lower-face contour changes than either modality alone; however, MFUS-containing treatments were associated with higher rates of transient paresthesia and rare transient motor weakness, underscoring the need for cautious parameter optimization. Adequately powered studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm durability and define the optimal efficacy–safety balance. Clinical trial registration : This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) under the registration number ChiCTR2400087490 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=227608 ), and was first posted on 29/07/2024.

Scientific Reports
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.