Three paths, one target group: comparison of recruitment methods for people with disabilities

Abstract This paper examines strategies for recruiting people with disabilities to participate in quantitative social research. Using a mixed-methods approach, three recruitment pathways were compared in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany from August 2023 to March 2024: Online convenience sampling via social media, Community-based organizational sampling (CBO), and Time-location sampling (TLS) in sheltered workshops for people with disabilities. The study recruited 1,211 participants across the three methods. Results indicate each strategy reached different subgroups within the disability community. Online convenience and CBO approaches provided broad reach, while TLS face-to-face in sheltered workshops was essential for including underrepresented individuals with higher support needs. The findings highlight the importance of using multiple complementary methods to achieve diverse, representative samples of people with disabilities. This research contributes insights on effective recruitment strategies to improve the inclusivity of disability studies and ensure the perspectives of people with disabilities are adequately represented in social research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universal Access in the Information Society
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-026-01376-x
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three paths, one target group: comparison of recruitment methods for people with disabilities

Zaza Zindel, Anne Stöcker
Universal Access in the Information Society
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Three paths, one target group: comparison of recruitment methods for people with disabilities

Zaza Zindel, Anne Stöcker
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines strategies for recruiting people with disabilities to participate in quantitative social research. Using a mixed-methods approach, three recruitment pathways were compared in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany from August 2023 to March 2024: Online convenience sampling via social media, Community-based organizational sampling (CBO), and Time-location sampling (TLS) in sheltered workshops for people with disabilities. The study recruited 1,211 participants across the three methods. Results indicate each strategy reached different subgroups within the disability community. Online convenience and CBO approaches provided broad reach, while TLS face-to-face in sheltered workshops was essential for including underrepresented individuals with higher support needs. The findings highlight the importance of using multiple complementary methods to achieve diverse, representative samples of people with disabilities. This research contributes insights on effective recruitment strategies to improve the inclusivity of disability studies and ensure the perspectives of people with disabilities are adequately represented in social research.

Universal Access in the Information SocietyVol. 25(4)
University of Kassel (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Universität Kassel
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.