Does Supporting SDG 16 Influence Firms' Exposure to Bribery, Corruption, and Fraud Controversies? The Role of Financial Reporting Quality

ABSTRACT Sustainable development has become a central focus in corporate governance, particularly in relation to the impact of anti‐corruption practices. Research on SDG 16 has largely focused on broad governance outcomes, paying little attention to its impact on misconduct and anti‐corruption practices at a firm level. Furthermore, there is limited research on whether improving the quality of financial reporting enhances the effectiveness of SDG 16 initiatives, particularly in the UK. This study examines the moderating effect of financial reporting quality, proxied by lower earnings management, on the relationship between Sustainable Development Goal 16 and corporate governance outcomes, specifically in the context of bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies score and policy bribery and corruption score. In addition, the study examines the moderating role of earnings management, as measured by the Modified Jones Model Discretionary Accruals, in the relationship between Sustainable Development Goal 16 and corporate governance outcomes, specifically in the context of the bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies score and the policy bribery and corruption score. Using a dataset of 3260 firm‐year observations from 326 companies in the industrial, energy, and basic materials sectors in the United Kingdom from 2014 to 2023, the study employs the generalized least squares random effect estimation technique to test the hypotheses and the two‐step Generalized Method of Moments for robustness of the results. The results indicate that firms aligning themselves with SDG 16 experience a negative correlation with bribery and corruption issues. Another important finding is that financial reporting quality, proxied by earnings management, strengthens the impact of anti‐corruption policies, promoting greater transparency, accountability, and alignment with SDG 16 objectives. The study emphasizes that the characteristics of organizations significantly influence the implementation of SDG16, which, in turn, impacts the practices related to bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70927
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Does Supporting SDG 16 Influence Firms' Exposure to Bribery, Corruption, and Fraud Controversies? The Role of Financial Reporting Quality

Meltem Altın, Lan Anh Nguyen, Mawih Kareem Al Ani
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Does Supporting SDG 16 Influence Firms' Exposure to Bribery, Corruption, and Fraud Controversies? The Role of Financial Reporting Quality

Meltem Altın, Lan Anh Nguyen, Mawih Kareem Al Ani
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustainable development has become a central focus in corporate governance, particularly in relation to the impact of anti‐corruption practices. Research on SDG 16 has largely focused on broad governance outcomes, paying little attention to its impact on misconduct and anti‐corruption practices at a firm level. Furthermore, there is limited research on whether improving the quality of financial reporting enhances the effectiveness of SDG 16 initiatives, particularly in the UK. This study examines the moderating effect of financial reporting quality, proxied by lower earnings management, on the relationship between Sustainable Development Goal 16 and corporate governance outcomes, specifically in the context of bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies score and policy bribery and corruption score. In addition, the study examines the moderating role of earnings management, as measured by the Modified Jones Model Discretionary Accruals, in the relationship between Sustainable Development Goal 16 and corporate governance outcomes, specifically in the context of the bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies score and the policy bribery and corruption score. Using a dataset of 3260 firm‐year observations from 326 companies in the industrial, energy, and basic materials sectors in the United Kingdom from 2014 to 2023, the study employs the generalized least squares random effect estimation technique to test the hypotheses and the two‐step Generalized Method of Moments for robustness of the results. The results indicate that firms aligning themselves with SDG 16 experience a negative correlation with bribery and corruption issues. Another important finding is that financial reporting quality, proxied by earnings management, strengthens the impact of anti‐corruption policies, promoting greater transparency, accountability, and alignment with SDG 16 objectives. The study emphasizes that the characteristics of organizations significantly influence the implementation of SDG16, which, in turn, impacts the practices related to bribery, corruption, and fraud controversies.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Sakarya University (TR), Dhofar University (OM), RMIT University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.