Writing Back to the Colonial Representation of the Mutiny in Manohar Malgonkar's The Devil's Wind 1

ABSTRACT The Devil's Wind seeks to critically engage with the British representation of the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny. However, its Indian critics analyse it in terms of its conformity to historical fact rather than its success or otherwise in executing the revisionist agenda at its heart. Conversely, the non‐Indian critics tend to evaluate it within a critical framework whose Eurocentric assumptions, such as the criteria of ‘objectivity’ and ‘universality’, work to its disadvantage, and in the process, they find it unsatisfactory. A more appropriate way to approach the text is to read its revisionist programme through a postcolonial critical framework such as the ‘writing back’ paradigm. In other words, the novel is best read as a postcolonial ‘con‐text’. Such an approach not only considers how Malgonkar revises and thus deconstructs the colonial (re)construction of the Rebellion but also situates the dialogue within the wider context of colonial discourse production and dissemination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Englishes
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.70057
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing Back to the Colonial Representation of the Mutiny in Manohar Malgonkar's The Devil's Wind 1

Md Rezaul Haque
World Englishes
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

Writing Back to the Colonial Representation of the Mutiny in Manohar Malgonkar's The Devil's Wind 1

Md Rezaul Haque
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Devil's Wind seeks to critically engage with the British representation of the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny. However, its Indian critics analyse it in terms of its conformity to historical fact rather than its success or otherwise in executing the revisionist agenda at its heart. Conversely, the non‐Indian critics tend to evaluate it within a critical framework whose Eurocentric assumptions, such as the criteria of ‘objectivity’ and ‘universality’, work to its disadvantage, and in the process, they find it unsatisfactory. A more appropriate way to approach the text is to read its revisionist programme through a postcolonial critical framework such as the ‘writing back’ paradigm. In other words, the novel is best read as a postcolonial ‘con‐text’. Such an approach not only considers how Malgonkar revises and thus deconstructs the colonial (re)construction of the Rebellion but also situates the dialogue within the wider context of colonial discourse production and dissemination.

World Englishes
St. John's University (US), St. John's University (TW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.