Contrasting Performance of Empirical Reference Evapotranspiration Models in Different Climatic Regions of China

ABSTRACT Reference evapotranspiration ( ET 0 ) is crucial in agricultural irrigation design and regional water resources allocation. However, understanding the applicability and performance of various empirical ET 0 models across diverse climatic conditions remains challenging. In this study, based on the daily meteorological data during 1994‐2016, including the measured global solar radiation ( R s ), 35 empirical ET 0 models were evaluated against the FAO‐56 Penman–Monteith formula (PM) across four climatic regions of China: temperate monsoon (I), temperate continental (II), mountain plateau (III), and subtropical monsoon (IV) regions. These models were classified into four categories: 13 temperature‐based, 15 radiation‐based, four mass transfer‐based, and three combined models. All models were pre‐corrected using the least square method to ensure comparability. The results showed that the combined models achieved the most accurate ET 0 estimates, followed by radiation‐, temperature‐, and mass transfer‐based models. Regionally, the radiation‐based FAO24 radiation formula exhibited the best performance in region I, with RMSE , MAE , and ENS of 0.245 mm d −1 , 0.210 mm d −1 , 0.975, respectively. In regions II, III, and IV, the combined Pen63 formula performed the best, with RMSE of 0.085, 0.113, and 0.095 mm d −1 , MAE of 0.066, 0.090, and 0.073 mm d −1 , and ENS of 0.998, 0.994, and 0.992, respectively. When u 2 or/and RH was unavailable, the optimal radiation‐based models were suitable for ET 0 estimation (FAO24 radiation formula for regions I and II, Priestley–Taylor formula for regions III and IV, respectively). In the absence of radiation data, the best temperature‐based models served as suitable alternatives to the PM formula (Baier–Roberston formula for regions I and III, McGuinness‐Bordne (2005) formula for region II, and Hargreaves correction formula for region IV, respectively). Therefore, the suitable empirical ET 0 models were recommended based on the data availability, providing flexible choices for ET 0 calculation across diverse climatic regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70565
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting Performance of Empirical Reference Evapotranspiration Models in Different Climatic Regions of China

Li Guo, Yaling Zhang, Lu Zhao, Chuan Liang et al.
International Journal of Climatology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Contrasting Performance of Empirical Reference Evapotranspiration Models in Different Climatic Regions of China

Li Guo, Yaling Zhang, Lu Zhao, Chuan Liang, Cun Zhan, Qingyan He, Renjuan WEI, Shouzheng Jiang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reference evapotranspiration ( ET 0 ) is crucial in agricultural irrigation design and regional water resources allocation. However, understanding the applicability and performance of various empirical ET 0 models across diverse climatic conditions remains challenging. In this study, based on the daily meteorological data during 1994‐2016, including the measured global solar radiation ( R s ), 35 empirical ET 0 models were evaluated against the FAO‐56 Penman–Monteith formula (PM) across four climatic regions of China: temperate monsoon (I), temperate continental (II), mountain plateau (III), and subtropical monsoon (IV) regions. These models were classified into four categories: 13 temperature‐based, 15 radiation‐based, four mass transfer‐based, and three combined models. All models were pre‐corrected using the least square method to ensure comparability. The results showed that the combined models achieved the most accurate ET 0 estimates, followed by radiation‐, temperature‐, and mass transfer‐based models. Regionally, the radiation‐based FAO24 radiation formula exhibited the best performance in region I, with RMSE , MAE , and ENS of 0.245 mm d −1 , 0.210 mm d −1 , 0.975, respectively. In regions II, III, and IV, the combined Pen63 formula performed the best, with RMSE of 0.085, 0.113, and 0.095 mm d −1 , MAE of 0.066, 0.090, and 0.073 mm d −1 , and ENS of 0.998, 0.994, and 0.992, respectively. When u 2 or/and RH was unavailable, the optimal radiation‐based models were suitable for ET 0 estimation (FAO24 radiation formula for regions I and II, Priestley–Taylor formula for regions III and IV, respectively). In the absence of radiation data, the best temperature‐based models served as suitable alternatives to the PM formula (Baier–Roberston formula for regions I and III, McGuinness‐Bordne (2005) formula for region II, and Hargreaves correction formula for region IV, respectively). Therefore, the suitable empirical ET 0 models were recommended based on the data availability, providing flexible choices for ET 0 calculation across diverse climatic regions.

International Journal of Climatology
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Sichuan Machinery Research and Design Institute (CN), Yalong Hydro (China) (CN), Ningxia Water Conservancy (CN), Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.