Nonoperative Management of the Adult Spinal Deformity Patient: A Biopsychosocial Intervention Versus Care-as-usual - A Comparative Treatment-Based Cohort Study With One-Year Follow-Up

Study design Comparative Cohort Study. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare a biopsychosocial intervention for chronic low back pain to unimodal, biomedically focused care-as-usual in symptomatic, conservatively managed adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Methods A comparative cohort study of a biopsychosocial intervention cohort ( n =95) and a care-as-usual cohort ( n =95). Inclusion criteria of both cohorts: age ≥18, no surgical indication, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)>20, coronal Cobb angle ≥20, idiopathic (AdIS) or degenerative (de novo) scoliosis (DN), baseline and one-year follow-up ODI data. Primary outcome: functional status (ODIv2.1a). Secondary outcomes: pain intensity (NPRS) and quality of life (SF36-PCS and SF36-MCS). Clinical relevance: minimal important clinical change (MCIC; improvement in ODI≥10 points), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS; ODI≤22). Results At one-year follow-up the patients in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort showed significantly greater improvement in functional status (ODI) compared to the care-as-usual cohort ( z =-3.97, p =<.001). Clinical relevance in terms of functional status: 49% of the patients in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort reached MCIC and 34% reached a PASS, compared to 23% and 15% respectively in the care-as-usual cohort. All secondary outcomes followed a similar pattern: greater improvement in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort. Conclusion This study shows clinically relevant and significantly greater improvement in function, pain, and quality of life in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort, compared to the unimodal, biomedically focused care-as-usual cohort at one-year follow-up. Targeting biopsychosocial factors offers a promising option in terms of improving outcome in nonoperative care for ASD patients with predominant back pain symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261481061
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonoperative Management of the Adult Spinal Deformity Patient: A Biopsychosocial Intervention Versus Care-as-usual - A Comparative Treatment-Based Cohort Study With One-Year Follow-Up

Marinus de Kleuver, Evelien H. W. Hoevenaars, Ferrán Pellisé, Javier Pizones et al.
Global Spine Journal
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Nonoperative Management of the Adult Spinal Deformity Patient: A Biopsychosocial Intervention Versus Care-as-usual - A Comparative Treatment-Based Cohort Study With One-Year Follow-Up

Marinus de Kleuver, Evelien H. W. Hoevenaars, Ferrán Pellisé, Javier Pizones, T. John O'Dowd, Maarten Spruit, Miranda Van Hooff, Ibrahim Obeid, M. Beekhuizen, Frank Kleinstueck, Ahmet Alanay, Yann Philippe Charles
article en

Abstract

Study design Comparative Cohort Study. Objectives The aim of this study was to compare a biopsychosocial intervention for chronic low back pain to unimodal, biomedically focused care-as-usual in symptomatic, conservatively managed adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. Methods A comparative cohort study of a biopsychosocial intervention cohort ( n =95) and a care-as-usual cohort ( n =95). Inclusion criteria of both cohorts: age ≥18, no surgical indication, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)>20, coronal Cobb angle ≥20, idiopathic (AdIS) or degenerative (de novo) scoliosis (DN), baseline and one-year follow-up ODI data. Primary outcome: functional status (ODIv2.1a). Secondary outcomes: pain intensity (NPRS) and quality of life (SF36-PCS and SF36-MCS). Clinical relevance: minimal important clinical change (MCIC; improvement in ODI≥10 points), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS; ODI≤22). Results At one-year follow-up the patients in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort showed significantly greater improvement in functional status (ODI) compared to the care-as-usual cohort ( z =-3.97, p =<.001). Clinical relevance in terms of functional status: 49% of the patients in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort reached MCIC and 34% reached a PASS, compared to 23% and 15% respectively in the care-as-usual cohort. All secondary outcomes followed a similar pattern: greater improvement in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort. Conclusion This study shows clinically relevant and significantly greater improvement in function, pain, and quality of life in the biopsychosocial intervention cohort, compared to the unimodal, biomedically focused care-as-usual cohort at one-year follow-up. Targeting biopsychosocial factors offers a promising option in terms of improving outcome in nonoperative care for ASD patients with predominant back pain symptoms.

Global Spine Journal
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Acıbadem University (TR), Schulthess-Klinik (CH), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Polyclinique de Franche Comté (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.