Prolonged response following anesthetic-only medial branch blocks: A retrospective analysis of 410 consecutive procedures

Introduction Medial branch blocks (MBBs) are procedures using short-acting local anesthetics to identify candidates for radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) in suspected facet-mediated pain. Although primarily prognostic tools, some studies report therapeutic responses to MBBs done with or without added corticosteroid, with rates ranging from 11% to over 50%. Even if intended as a diagnostic procedure, prolonged responses to anesthetic-only MBBs, defined as persisting days to months, well beyond the hours-long pharmacokinetic window of the local anesthetic, represent a diagnostic issue to physicians with a poorly defined incidence. This study retrospectively evaluated 410 consecutive MBBs to determine the proportion achieving documented sustained pain relief following anesthetic-only MBBs. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 410 consecutive MBBs performed during 2019 at a single academic institution by 4 fellowship-trained physiatrists. All procedures were performed using either 0.25 mL or 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. Therapeutic response was defined as meeting all three criteria: ≥80% pain relief calculated from chart records; no progression to repeat block or radiofrequency neurotomy; and explicit clinical documentation of sustained relief as the rationale for halting treatment. Chart review identified patients who did not progress for other reasons including insurance denial, patient preference, loss to follow-up, or alternative treatments. 95% confidence intervals were calculated for therapeutic response rates. Follow-up was retrospective and based on subsequent available medical record review rather than a standardized prospective assessment interval. Results 410 patients underwent medial branch blocks of the cervical or lumbar spine in the study period. Eight patients (1.95%; 95% CI: 0.85-3.81%) met criteria for prolonged response with documented sustained benefit. Of these, minimum confirmed durations of relief ranged from 21 to 331 days (median 53 days; mean 86.5 days). An additional 11 patients (2.7%) did not progress but lacked documented rationale. Conclusions This represents the lowest rate of prolonged pain relief following MBBs reported in published literature. Our findings do not support the premise that routine anesthetic-only MBBs have therapeutic benefit. This study is the first to quantify the incidence of how often a MBB intended for diagnostic purposes halts further treatment due to unexplained pain relief.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Pain Medicine
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2026.100816
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prolonged response following anesthetic-only medial branch blocks: A retrospective analysis of 410 consecutive procedures

Byron J. Schneider, David Sherwood, Jakob T. Dovgan, Jihong Min
Interventional Pain Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Prolonged response following anesthetic-only medial branch blocks: A retrospective analysis of 410 consecutive procedures

Byron J. Schneider, David Sherwood, Jakob T. Dovgan, Jihong Min
article en

Abstract

Introduction Medial branch blocks (MBBs) are procedures using short-acting local anesthetics to identify candidates for radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) in suspected facet-mediated pain. Although primarily prognostic tools, some studies report therapeutic responses to MBBs done with or without added corticosteroid, with rates ranging from 11% to over 50%. Even if intended as a diagnostic procedure, prolonged responses to anesthetic-only MBBs, defined as persisting days to months, well beyond the hours-long pharmacokinetic window of the local anesthetic, represent a diagnostic issue to physicians with a poorly defined incidence. This study retrospectively evaluated 410 consecutive MBBs to determine the proportion achieving documented sustained pain relief following anesthetic-only MBBs. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 410 consecutive MBBs performed during 2019 at a single academic institution by 4 fellowship-trained physiatrists. All procedures were performed using either 0.25 mL or 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. Therapeutic response was defined as meeting all three criteria: ≥80% pain relief calculated from chart records; no progression to repeat block or radiofrequency neurotomy; and explicit clinical documentation of sustained relief as the rationale for halting treatment. Chart review identified patients who did not progress for other reasons including insurance denial, patient preference, loss to follow-up, or alternative treatments. 95% confidence intervals were calculated for therapeutic response rates. Follow-up was retrospective and based on subsequent available medical record review rather than a standardized prospective assessment interval. Results 410 patients underwent medial branch blocks of the cervical or lumbar spine in the study period. Eight patients (1.95%; 95% CI: 0.85-3.81%) met criteria for prolonged response with documented sustained benefit. Of these, minimum confirmed durations of relief ranged from 21 to 331 days (median 53 days; mean 86.5 days). An additional 11 patients (2.7%) did not progress but lacked documented rationale. Conclusions This represents the lowest rate of prolonged pain relief following MBBs reported in published literature. Our findings do not support the premise that routine anesthetic-only MBBs have therapeutic benefit. This study is the first to quantify the incidence of how often a MBB intended for diagnostic purposes halts further treatment due to unexplained pain relief.

Interventional Pain MedicineVol. 5(3)
University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Lakewood Regional Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.