A National Survey of Informal Supporters' Experiences and Views of Behaviour Support Practitioners in the National Disability Insurance Scheme

ABSTRACT This study examines informal supporters' experiences and views of NDIS behaviour support practitioners, including engagement, information needed to support selection, and perceptions of practitioners' knowledge, skill, and practice. It reports data from a cross‐sectional online survey of 123 informal support providers of participants receiving NDIS behaviour support services, capturing quantitative ratings (descriptive statistics) and qualitative insights (thematic analysis). Most supporters (64%) understood practitioner roles but reported insufficient information and support in engaging suitable practitioners, with access barriers for regional participants. Confidence in practitioner skills varied greatly: moderate overall (32%), but low skills in participant engagement (42%), plans reflecting participant values (42%), implementation support (42%), and fade out planning for restrictive practices (52%). Reported strengths included collaboration and communication skills, but gaps revealed a lack of skills in stakeholder engagement, disability‐specific knowledge, compliance‐focus over outcomes, and limited hands‐on support. Supporters prioritised relevant qualifications plus lived experience and disability‐specific knowledge. Findings suggest variability in supporters' confidence in practitioners' knowledge, skills and practice, raising questions about what to prioritise when selecting a practitioner. Systemic reforms are needed to support more consistent and rights‐based behaviour support provision, including transparency in practitioner information, increased involvement of participants and informal supporters, and workforce capabilities emphasising disability expertise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.70135
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A National Survey of Informal Supporters' Experiences and Views of Behaviour Support Practitioners in the National Disability Insurance Scheme

Russell A. Fox, Alinka Fisher, Irene Belperio, Keith McVilly et al.
Australian Journal of Social Issues
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

A National Survey of Informal Supporters' Experiences and Views of Behaviour Support Practitioners in the National Disability Insurance Scheme

Russell A. Fox, Alinka Fisher, Irene Belperio, Keith McVilly, Erin Leif, Maverick Clissold, David Nicoll, Aiden Osborne
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines informal supporters' experiences and views of NDIS behaviour support practitioners, including engagement, information needed to support selection, and perceptions of practitioners' knowledge, skill, and practice. It reports data from a cross‐sectional online survey of 123 informal support providers of participants receiving NDIS behaviour support services, capturing quantitative ratings (descriptive statistics) and qualitative insights (thematic analysis). Most supporters (64%) understood practitioner roles but reported insufficient information and support in engaging suitable practitioners, with access barriers for regional participants. Confidence in practitioner skills varied greatly: moderate overall (32%), but low skills in participant engagement (42%), plans reflecting participant values (42%), implementation support (42%), and fade out planning for restrictive practices (52%). Reported strengths included collaboration and communication skills, but gaps revealed a lack of skills in stakeholder engagement, disability‐specific knowledge, compliance‐focus over outcomes, and limited hands‐on support. Supporters prioritised relevant qualifications plus lived experience and disability‐specific knowledge. Findings suggest variability in supporters' confidence in practitioners' knowledge, skills and practice, raising questions about what to prioritise when selecting a practitioner. Systemic reforms are needed to support more consistent and rights‐based behaviour support provision, including transparency in practitioner information, increased involvement of participants and informal supporters, and workforce capabilities emphasising disability expertise.

Australian Journal of Social Issues
The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), Monash University (AU)
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.