Development and Validation of the Digital Mentalizing Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Self-Report for Online Social Networks

Digital interactions are increasingly central to human social life, yet existing measures of mentalizing—defined as the capacity to interpret one’s own and others’ mental states—are primarily designed for face-to-face contexts and fail to capture the unique cognitive-affective demands of online social networks. This research introduces the Digital Mentalizing Questionnaire (DMQ), the first multidimensional, theory-driven instrument specifically developed to assess mentalizing processes in digital environments. Across three studies ( N 1 = 278, N 2 = 375, N 3 = 341; participants in Studies 1, 2, and 3 were predominantly female adults with mean ages of 32.95 [ SD = 12.10] and 30.89 [ SD = 10.68] years, respectively, and varied educational backgrounds), the DMQ demonstrated a robust five-factor structure encompassing Digital Self-Mentalizing, Digital Other-Mentalizing, Digital Emotion Regulation, Digital Anticipatory Mentalizing, and Digital Identity Integration. Exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed structural validity, while internal consistency (α = .67–.86), composite reliability, and 1-month test–retest reliability ( r = .58–.79) indicated strong psychometric stability. Measurement invariance across gender further confirmed the scale’s applicability for comparative research (Study 2). Convergent validity was supported through theoretically coherent correlations with established mentalizing measures (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, Mentalization Questionnaire, Mentalization Emotion Questionnaire, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale) and negative associations with transdiagnostic psychopathology indicators (Study 3). The DMQ offers a validated, ecologically relevant framework for assessing digital mentalizing, bridging classical theory with contemporary online social cognition. Its application holds promise for advancing cyberpsychology research, informing digital well-being interventions, and understanding the socio-cognitive mechanisms underlying online behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Assessment
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261477186
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Digital Mentalizing Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Self-Report for Online Social Networks

Mohammad Reza Abedi, Mehdi Rahmani Malek-Abad
Assessment
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Development and Validation of the Digital Mentalizing Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Self-Report for Online Social Networks

Mohammad Reza Abedi, Mehdi Rahmani Malek-Abad
article en

Abstract

Digital interactions are increasingly central to human social life, yet existing measures of mentalizing—defined as the capacity to interpret one’s own and others’ mental states—are primarily designed for face-to-face contexts and fail to capture the unique cognitive-affective demands of online social networks. This research introduces the Digital Mentalizing Questionnaire (DMQ), the first multidimensional, theory-driven instrument specifically developed to assess mentalizing processes in digital environments. Across three studies ( N 1 = 278, N 2 = 375, N 3 = 341; participants in Studies 1, 2, and 3 were predominantly female adults with mean ages of 32.95 [ SD = 12.10] and 30.89 [ SD = 10.68] years, respectively, and varied educational backgrounds), the DMQ demonstrated a robust five-factor structure encompassing Digital Self-Mentalizing, Digital Other-Mentalizing, Digital Emotion Regulation, Digital Anticipatory Mentalizing, and Digital Identity Integration. Exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed structural validity, while internal consistency (α = .67–.86), composite reliability, and 1-month test–retest reliability ( r = .58–.79) indicated strong psychometric stability. Measurement invariance across gender further confirmed the scale’s applicability for comparative research (Study 2). Convergent validity was supported through theoretically coherent correlations with established mentalizing measures (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, Mentalization Questionnaire, Mentalization Emotion Questionnaire, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale) and negative associations with transdiagnostic psychopathology indicators (Study 3). The DMQ offers a validated, ecologically relevant framework for assessing digital mentalizing, bridging classical theory with contemporary online social cognition. Its application holds promise for advancing cyberpsychology research, informing digital well-being interventions, and understanding the socio-cognitive mechanisms underlying online behavior.

Assessment
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (IR), University of Isfahan (IR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.