Research progress in the clinical application of AI in strabismus

PURPOSE: Strabismus diagnosis and management remain subjective due to variable measurement techniques and lack of standardized surgical criteria. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in ophthalmology, but its clinical translation in strabismus is underexplored. This review systematically summarizes current AI applications and challenges in strabismus diagnosis, surgical planning, and postoperative training. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI for studies up to 2025 using keywords "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "deep learning," "strabismus," and "eye tracking." Studies on AI-based detection, angle measurement, surgical dosage prediction, and outcome evaluation were included. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies were analyzed. AI applications focus on three areas: (1) Deep learning on corneal reflection and facial photographs achieved diagnostic sensitivity of 94-99.1% and specificity up to 99.3%, outperforming clinicians in some datasets; (2) Eye-tracking technology showed ~90% correlation with prism cover test and higher repeatability (ICC 0.99 vs. 0.91, p<0.02) in children; (3) Surgical planning models (support vector regression, decision trees) predicted muscle recession/resection with mean errors of 0.5-0.8 mm. However, most models lack multi-center prospective validation. CONCLUSION: Despite promising accuracy, clinical adoption faces challenges: single-center data bias, poor interpretability, infrastructure gaps in remote areas, and no regulatory approvals. Future work requires multi-center trials, explainable AI, and user-friendly deployment to ensure equitable global use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strabismus
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2026.2718344
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research progress in the clinical application of AI in strabismus

Z Wang, Tao Peng, Lu Yu, Pei Chen et al.
Strabismus
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
article

Research progress in the clinical application of AI in strabismus

Z Wang, Tao Peng, Lu Yu, Pei Chen, Yimeng Qu, Huijie Yang, Tingnan Huang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Strabismus diagnosis and management remain subjective due to variable measurement techniques and lack of standardized surgical criteria. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential in ophthalmology, but its clinical translation in strabismus is underexplored. This review systematically summarizes current AI applications and challenges in strabismus diagnosis, surgical planning, and postoperative training. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI for studies up to 2025 using keywords "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "deep learning," "strabismus," and "eye tracking." Studies on AI-based detection, angle measurement, surgical dosage prediction, and outcome evaluation were included. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies were analyzed. AI applications focus on three areas: (1) Deep learning on corneal reflection and facial photographs achieved diagnostic sensitivity of 94-99.1% and specificity up to 99.3%, outperforming clinicians in some datasets; (2) Eye-tracking technology showed ~90% correlation with prism cover test and higher repeatability (ICC 0.99 vs. 0.91, p<0.02) in children; (3) Surgical planning models (support vector regression, decision trees) predicted muscle recession/resection with mean errors of 0.5-0.8 mm. However, most models lack multi-center prospective validation. CONCLUSION: Despite promising accuracy, clinical adoption faces challenges: single-center data bias, poor interpretability, infrastructure gaps in remote areas, and no regulatory approvals. Future work requires multi-center trials, explainable AI, and user-friendly deployment to ensure equitable global use.

Strabismus
Jiaxing University (CN), First Hospital of Jiaxing (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.