Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of CAD/CAM-assisted surgery versus model-assisted conventional technique

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap (FFF) performed using model-assisted conventional technique versus computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with virtual surgical planning (VSP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent microvascular mandibular reconstruction with FFF between January 2016 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, segmental mandibular resection, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups: model-assisted conventional reconstruction (Group A) and CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction with VSP (Group B). Demographic, pathological, and surgical variables were collected. Morphological and functional outcomes were assessed using validated instruments including the Katsuragi Scale, FACE-Q Aesthetics, EORTC QLQ-H&N43, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Speech Handicap Index (SHI). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included (11 in Group A, 21 in Group B). CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction showed significantly better aesthetic outcomes according to both patient and surgeon evaluations with Katsuragi Scale (p = 0.0001). FACE-Q Satisfaction with Surgical Outcome scores were significantly higher in Group B (p = 0.02). Patients treated with CAD/CAM also reported significantly fewer self-reported speech-related disturbances according to the SHI (p = 0.01). Other functional measures showed favourable trends for CAD/CAM reconstruction but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction was associated with improved aesthetic outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and better speech-related function compared with conventional techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digital surgical planning may improve the precision and predictability of mandibular reconstruction and was associated with better patient-reported outcomes, particularly in speech-related function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-026-01630-9
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of CAD/CAM-assisted surgery versus model-assisted conventional technique

F. Secco, Ylenia Gugliotta, G. Ramieri, M. Fasolis et al.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of CAD/CAM-assisted surgery versus model-assisted conventional technique

F. Secco, Ylenia Gugliotta, G. Ramieri, M. Fasolis, C. Giraudi, A. Novaresio
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes of mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap (FFF) performed using model-assisted conventional technique versus computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with virtual surgical planning (VSP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent microvascular mandibular reconstruction with FFF between January 2016 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, segmental mandibular resection, and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups: model-assisted conventional reconstruction (Group A) and CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction with VSP (Group B). Demographic, pathological, and surgical variables were collected. Morphological and functional outcomes were assessed using validated instruments including the Katsuragi Scale, FACE-Q Aesthetics, EORTC QLQ-H&N43, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Speech Handicap Index (SHI). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included (11 in Group A, 21 in Group B). CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction showed significantly better aesthetic outcomes according to both patient and surgeon evaluations with Katsuragi Scale (p = 0.0001). FACE-Q Satisfaction with Surgical Outcome scores were significantly higher in Group B (p = 0.02). Patients treated with CAD/CAM also reported significantly fewer self-reported speech-related disturbances according to the SHI (p = 0.01). Other functional measures showed favourable trends for CAD/CAM reconstruction but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction was associated with improved aesthetic outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and better speech-related function compared with conventional techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digital surgical planning may improve the precision and predictability of mandibular reconstruction and was associated with better patient-reported outcomes, particularly in speech-related function.

Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 30(1)
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
Università degli Studi di Torino
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.