A Paired-Marker Framework for Interpreting Anti-Ascaris lumbricoides IgG Serology and Copromicroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Almaty and the Almaty Region, Kazakhstan

Background. Stool microscopy and anti-Ascaris IgG serology assess different, but related biological domains. Joint interpretation can identify immunological exposure and intestinal egg shedding without assuming one or both markers are a measure of current infection independently. Objective. To develop a four-pattern paired-marker framework for anti-A. lumbricoides IgG and copromicroscopy results from adults in Kazakhstan and to assess the qualitative analytical concordance of two IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods. The cross-sectional field study involved 1000 adult volunteers from Almaty and the region providing matched serum and stool samples. Sera were tested by MVA Group indirect anti-Ascaris IgG ELISA, and stool samples were examined by the Kato–Katz and Fülleborn methods. The binary outcome was classified into four pair patterns. All sera were further tested with a commercial ELISA (DRG), and qualitative concordance was calculated. Results. Anti-Ascaris IgG was found in 331 of the 1000 subjects (33.1%; 95% CI, 30.3–36.1%), while A. lumbricoides eggs were detected in 240 subjects (24.0%; 95% CI, 21.5–26.7%). The paired patterns were IgG-positive/egg-positive in 185 participants (18.5%), IgG-positive/egg-negative in 146 (14.6%), IgG-negative/egg-positive in 55 (5.5%), and IgG-negative/egg-negative in 614 (61.4%). IgG positivity was detected in 77.1% of subjects with detected eggs and 19.2% of subjects without detected eggs (odds ratio, 14.15; 95% CI, 9.96–20.09; p < 0.001). The MVA Group and DRG ELISAs agreed for 990 of 1000 specimens (99.0%; 95% CI, 98.2–99.5%), with positive and negative agreements of 98.2% and 99.4%, respectively (κ = 0.98). Conclusions. Serology and copromicroscopy showed a high association, but they are not interchangeable. The paired-marker paradigm clarified concordant and discordant patterns while retaining IgG as a marker of past or ongoing immune exposure and stool eggs as markers of shedding at the time of sampling. High inter-assay agreement suggests analytical consistency within this serum panel, but does not imply diagnostic accuracy for active ascariasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pathogens
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens15090896
Primary Topic
Parasites and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Paired-Marker Framework for Interpreting Anti-Ascaris lumbricoides IgG Serology and Copromicroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Almaty and the Almaty Region, Kazakhstan

Dulat Inkarbekov, Timur Davlyatshin, Mukhit B. Orynbayev, S.M. Barmak et al.
Pathogens
Parasites and Host Interactions
article

A Paired-Marker Framework for Interpreting Anti-Ascaris lumbricoides IgG Serology and Copromicroscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Almaty and the Almaty Region, Kazakhstan

Dulat Inkarbekov, Timur Davlyatshin, Mukhit B. Orynbayev, S.M. Barmak, Aiganym Tussipova, Асылжан Мырзахмет, Aidar Namet, Berik Khairullin, Kulyaisan Sultankulova, Oralkhan Tusipkanuly
article en

Abstract

Background. Stool microscopy and anti-Ascaris IgG serology assess different, but related biological domains. Joint interpretation can identify immunological exposure and intestinal egg shedding without assuming one or both markers are a measure of current infection independently. Objective. To develop a four-pattern paired-marker framework for anti-A. lumbricoides IgG and copromicroscopy results from adults in Kazakhstan and to assess the qualitative analytical concordance of two IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Methods. The cross-sectional field study involved 1000 adult volunteers from Almaty and the region providing matched serum and stool samples. Sera were tested by MVA Group indirect anti-Ascaris IgG ELISA, and stool samples were examined by the Kato–Katz and Fülleborn methods. The binary outcome was classified into four pair patterns. All sera were further tested with a commercial ELISA (DRG), and qualitative concordance was calculated. Results. Anti-Ascaris IgG was found in 331 of the 1000 subjects (33.1%; 95% CI, 30.3–36.1%), while A. lumbricoides eggs were detected in 240 subjects (24.0%; 95% CI, 21.5–26.7%). The paired patterns were IgG-positive/egg-positive in 185 participants (18.5%), IgG-positive/egg-negative in 146 (14.6%), IgG-negative/egg-positive in 55 (5.5%), and IgG-negative/egg-negative in 614 (61.4%). IgG positivity was detected in 77.1% of subjects with detected eggs and 19.2% of subjects without detected eggs (odds ratio, 14.15; 95% CI, 9.96–20.09; p < 0.001). The MVA Group and DRG ELISAs agreed for 990 of 1000 specimens (99.0%; 95% CI, 98.2–99.5%), with positive and negative agreements of 98.2% and 99.4%, respectively (κ = 0.98). Conclusions. Serology and copromicroscopy showed a high association, but they are not interchangeable. The paired-marker paradigm clarified concordant and discordant patterns while retaining IgG as a marker of past or ongoing immune exposure and stool eggs as markers of shedding at the time of sampling. High inter-assay agreement suggests analytical consistency within this serum panel, but does not imply diagnostic accuracy for active ascariasis.

PathogensVol. 15(9)
Kazakh Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant growing (KZ), Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Parasites and Host Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.