Feasibility of Conventional Abdominal Ultrasound for Monitoring Tumor Size After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or transplantation. Although current evidence for imaging assessment after SBRT is largely based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), repeated contrast-enhanced imaging may be difficult to perform at every routine follow-up visit. Thus, we evaluated whether conventional abdominal ultrasound (US) can monitor tumor size after SBRT for HCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for HCC at our institution between January 2015 and October 2020. After excluding patients treated for local recurrence after RFA or transarterial chemoembolization, those whose lesions were not visible on pretreatment US, and those without follow-up US within one year, 32 patients with 32 nodules were analyzed. Tumor visibility and size changes on US were assessed before treatment and at <6, 6–12, and 12–18 months after SBRT. Results: The treated lesion was identified as a discrete nodule on US in 100% (15/15; 95% CI, 78.2–100%), 75.0% (18/24; 95% CI, 53.3–90.2%), and 50.0% (8/16; 95% CI, 24.7–75.3%) of examinations at <6, 6–12, and 12–18 months, respectively. In all cases in which the lesion was no longer measurable on US, contrast-enhanced CT/MRI showed complete or partial response. Local tumor progression occurred in one patient (3.1%) during a median follow-up of 24.1 months; in this patient, interval enlargement was first detected by US 3.7 months after SBRT and was subsequently confirmed by dynamic CT/MRI. Conclusions: These descriptive findings suggest that in selected patients with lesions clearly visible on pretreatment US, conventional abdominal US may provide complementary morphologic information during the first year after SBRT when used alongside periodic dynamic CT/MRI. Prospective validation is required before routine implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091893
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of Conventional Abdominal Ultrasound for Monitoring Tumor Size After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hirokazu Mouri, Takahisa Kayahara, Satoshi Itasaka, Hideki Hanazawa et al.
Biomedicines
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Feasibility of Conventional Abdominal Ultrasound for Monitoring Tumor Size After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hirokazu Mouri, Takahisa Kayahara, Satoshi Itasaka, Hideki Hanazawa, Motowo Mizuno, Hiroyuki Takabatake, Youichi Morimoto, Yohei Yamanouchi, Masayuki Ueno
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is unsuitable for surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or transplantation. Although current evidence for imaging assessment after SBRT is largely based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), repeated contrast-enhanced imaging may be difficult to perform at every routine follow-up visit. Thus, we evaluated whether conventional abdominal ultrasound (US) can monitor tumor size after SBRT for HCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for HCC at our institution between January 2015 and October 2020. After excluding patients treated for local recurrence after RFA or transarterial chemoembolization, those whose lesions were not visible on pretreatment US, and those without follow-up US within one year, 32 patients with 32 nodules were analyzed. Tumor visibility and size changes on US were assessed before treatment and at <6, 6–12, and 12–18 months after SBRT. Results: The treated lesion was identified as a discrete nodule on US in 100% (15/15; 95% CI, 78.2–100%), 75.0% (18/24; 95% CI, 53.3–90.2%), and 50.0% (8/16; 95% CI, 24.7–75.3%) of examinations at <6, 6–12, and 12–18 months, respectively. In all cases in which the lesion was no longer measurable on US, contrast-enhanced CT/MRI showed complete or partial response. Local tumor progression occurred in one patient (3.1%) during a median follow-up of 24.1 months; in this patient, interval enlargement was first detected by US 3.7 months after SBRT and was subsequently confirmed by dynamic CT/MRI. Conclusions: These descriptive findings suggest that in selected patients with lesions clearly visible on pretreatment US, conventional abdominal US may provide complementary morphologic information during the first year after SBRT when used alongside periodic dynamic CT/MRI. Prospective validation is required before routine implementation.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(9)
Kyoto University (JP), Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.