Metformin in High Metabolic Risk Pregnancies — A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine whether metformin prevents gestational diabetes (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline/Medline In-Process, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases through May 9, 2025, to identify double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials using metformin in pregnancies without diabetes. Predefined primary maternal outcomes were GDM and glycemic indices from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs). Primary neonatal outcomes were gestational age at delivery and neonatal anthropometry. One-stage mixed-effects models using individual participant data (IPD) were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, gestational age at commencement, and baseline blood glucose level. RESULTS: Ten trials (N=2695) met inclusion criteria and seven provided IPD (n=2485; 92.2% of available IPD). After data harmonization, 2297 pregnancies (1159 participants randomly assigned to metformin and 1138 participants to placebo) were included. Metformin was not associated with reduced GDM in adjusted or unadjusted analyses, including by World Health Organization 1999 criteria (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.36; adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.41) or by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2015 criteria (odds ratio 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.27; adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.41), except on adjusted analysis using International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups thresholds (odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.06; adjusted odds ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98). Metformin was associated with marginally lower fasting blood glucose level (mean difference [MD], -0.06 mmol/l; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01), with no apparent difference in 2-hour postload blood glucose level. Metformin was also associated with longer gestation (MD, 0.30 weeks' gestation; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.54), lower odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89), and larger neonatal head circumference (MD, 2.43 percentile; 95% CI, 0.13 to 4.72). Gastrointestinal side effects were more commonly reported with metformin. CONCLUSIONS: In this IPD meta-analysis, metformin was not associated with a reduction in GDM, but was associated with an increase in gestational age at delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Evidence
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2500337
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Metformin in High Metabolic Risk Pregnancies — A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

William M. Hague, Masoud Mohebbi, Eszter Vanky, Agnieszka Zawiejska et al.
1 citations
NEJM Evidence
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
9.97
article

Metformin in High Metabolic Risk Pregnancies — A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

William M. Hague, Masoud Mohebbi, Eszter Vanky, Agnieszka Zawiejska, Tapani Rönnemaa, Tayyiba Wasim, Kristiina Tertti, Zohar Nachum, Hilkka Nikkinen, Jahanara Ainuddin, Enav Yefet, Rabia Arshad, Magdy A. Mohamed, Jerrie Refuerzo, Hassan Shehata, Jane E. Norman, Joanne Enticott, Jodie Dodd, Helena J. Teede, Laure Morin-Papunen, Sven M. Carlsen, Chau Thien Tay, Yitayeh Belsti, Argyro Syngelaki, Aya Mousa, Christy Burden, Jiji E. Mathews, Kypros Nicolaides, Andrea Deussen, Tone S. Løvvik, Janet Rowan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine whether metformin prevents gestational diabetes (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We searched Medline/Medline In-Process, Embase, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases through May 9, 2025, to identify double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials using metformin in pregnancies without diabetes. Predefined primary maternal outcomes were GDM and glycemic indices from oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs). Primary neonatal outcomes were gestational age at delivery and neonatal anthropometry. One-stage mixed-effects models using individual participant data (IPD) were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index, gestational age at commencement, and baseline blood glucose level. RESULTS: Ten trials (N=2695) met inclusion criteria and seven provided IPD (n=2485; 92.2% of available IPD). After data harmonization, 2297 pregnancies (1159 participants randomly assigned to metformin and 1138 participants to placebo) were included. Metformin was not associated with reduced GDM in adjusted or unadjusted analyses, including by World Health Organization 1999 criteria (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.36; adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.41) or by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence 2015 criteria (odds ratio 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.27; adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.41), except on adjusted analysis using International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups thresholds (odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.06; adjusted odds ratio 0.71; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98). Metformin was associated with marginally lower fasting blood glucose level (mean difference [MD], -0.06 mmol/l; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01), with no apparent difference in 2-hour postload blood glucose level. Metformin was also associated with longer gestation (MD, 0.30 weeks' gestation; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.54), lower odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.89), and larger neonatal head circumference (MD, 2.43 percentile; 95% CI, 0.13 to 4.72). Gastrointestinal side effects were more commonly reported with metformin. CONCLUSIONS: In this IPD meta-analysis, metformin was not associated with a reduction in GDM, but was associated with an increase in gestational age at delivery.

NEJM EvidenceVol. 5(9)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Services Institute of Medical Sciences (PK), Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Nottingham (GB), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Emek Medical Center (IL), Women's and Children's Hospital (AU), Turku University Hospital (FI), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), Auckland District Health Board (NZ), Monash Health (AU), Poriya Medical Center (IL), King's College Hospital (GB), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Sohag University (EG), University of Oulu (FI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
9.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.