Agreement and classification performance of the heaviness of smoking index (HSI) compared with the Fagerström test for cigarette dependence (FTCD): A subgroup analysis

Background The Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) is a brief tool for assessing nicotine addiction. This study evaluated the agreement and classification performance of the HSI relative to the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD). Methods In this cross-sectional study of 1147 adult smokers, HSI scores were derived from the FTCD. Agreement and apparent classification performance were examined using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cohen's kappa, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Bland–Altman plots across demographic and behavioral subgroups. Results HSI showed a strong correlation with FTCD ( r = 0.904) and excellent continuous agreement (ICC = 0.95). Categorical agreement for high nicotine addiction was substantial (κ ≈ 0.65). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent apparent classification performance (AUC = 0.942) for identifying FTCD-defined severe addiction. An HSI cut-off of ≥3 (derived from an optimal threshold of 2.5) provided a favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity for initial screening, whereas a cut-off of ≥4 showed high specificity for severe addiction. Performance remained generally consistent across subgroups, although some subgroup-specific variation was observed. Bland–Altman analysis indicated minimal mean bias, although HSI proportionally underestimated addiction at higher severity levels. Conclusion HSI demonstrates strong agreement with FTCD and may serve as a rapid screening measure for assessing nicotine addiction. A lower cut-off (≥3) may be useful for initial screening, whereas a higher cut-off (≥4) may help identify severe addiction. Caution is warranted at higher addiction levels and among poly-tobacco users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2026.100740
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agreement and classification performance of the heaviness of smoking index (HSI) compared with the Fagerström test for cigarette dependence (FTCD): A subgroup analysis

Bagher Pahlavanzadeh, Seyed Ghadir Hosseini, Arezou Foroughi, Abdurrahman Charkazi et al.
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Agreement and classification performance of the heaviness of smoking index (HSI) compared with the Fagerström test for cigarette dependence (FTCD): A subgroup analysis

Bagher Pahlavanzadeh, Seyed Ghadir Hosseini, Arezou Foroughi, Abdurrahman Charkazi, Hajar Dehghan
article en

Abstract

Background The Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) is a brief tool for assessing nicotine addiction. This study evaluated the agreement and classification performance of the HSI relative to the Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD). Methods In this cross-sectional study of 1147 adult smokers, HSI scores were derived from the FTCD. Agreement and apparent classification performance were examined using Pearson correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cohen's kappa, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Bland–Altman plots across demographic and behavioral subgroups. Results HSI showed a strong correlation with FTCD ( r = 0.904) and excellent continuous agreement (ICC = 0.95). Categorical agreement for high nicotine addiction was substantial (κ ≈ 0.65). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent apparent classification performance (AUC = 0.942) for identifying FTCD-defined severe addiction. An HSI cut-off of ≥3 (derived from an optimal threshold of 2.5) provided a favorable balance between sensitivity and specificity for initial screening, whereas a cut-off of ≥4 showed high specificity for severe addiction. Performance remained generally consistent across subgroups, although some subgroup-specific variation was observed. Bland–Altman analysis indicated minimal mean bias, although HSI proportionally underestimated addiction at higher severity levels. Conclusion HSI demonstrates strong agreement with FTCD and may serve as a rapid screening measure for assessing nicotine addiction. A lower cut-off (≥3) may be useful for initial screening, whereas a higher cut-off (≥4) may help identify severe addiction. Caution is warranted at higher addiction levels and among poly-tobacco users.

Addictive Behaviors ReportsVol. 24
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Golestan University (IR), Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Gonbad Kavous University (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.