Comparison of first attempt success rate of ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation in supine vs prone position: a prospective randomized controlled trial- PROSPECTUS trial (prone vs supine positioning evaluation for central line insertio
Background: Cannulation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) is traditionally performed in the supine position; however, during surgeries in the prone position, it may become necessary to obtain central venous access because of unexpected blood loss. Methods: This prospective, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted at an academic medical center between May 2024 and June 2025. A total of 192 adult patients requiring IJV cannulation were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: the supine (S) group and the prone (P) group. All procedures were performed using an ultrasound (USG)-guided short-axis, out-of-plane approach. The primary outcome was to compare first-attempt success between the supine and prone positions. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of access time, guidewire insertion time, catheterization time, number of attempts, and associated complications. Results: The first-attempt success rate was 90.62% in the supine position compared with 77.08% in the prone position (absolute risk difference, 13.54%; two-sided 90% CI, 4.95–22.13%), indicating that the non-inferiority of prone vs supine was not demonstrated. The prone group had considerably longer access, guidewire insertion, and catheterization times than the supine group ( P < 0.0001). However, despite these statistically significant differences, successful cannulation was achieved in both groups. The complication rates were similar across the two groups ( P = 0.688). Conclusion: In this study, USG-guided IJV cannulation in the prone position did not meet the pre-specified criterion for non-inferiority compared with the supine approach. It was nonetheless achievable in all patients in the hands of skilled practitioners, suggesting its use as a rescue option rather than as a comparable alternative.
Authors
- Shilpa Goyal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-0953)
- Nikhil Kothari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-905X)
- Manbir Kaur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1245-2536)
- Akhil Dhanesh Goel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6156-7903)
- Arun Mukesh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-4516)
- Ankur Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-6988)
- Aathira Surendran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-9714)
- Pradeep Bhatia
- Konica Chittoria (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-8188)
- Darshana Rathod
- Kamlesh Kumari
Institutions
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2026-08-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000005571
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00