Quantitative Comparative Evaluation of Aluminum- and Iron-Based Coagulants for Domestic Greywater Treatment

Greywater treatment is an essential component of sustainable water management strategies, particularly in regions experiencing water scarcity. This study presents a quantitative comparative evaluation of three conventional inorganic coagulants—aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3), ferric sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3), and ferric chloride (FeCl3)—for domestic greywater treatment using standardized jar test procedures. The initial turbidity of the greywater was 186 ± 5 NTU. Coagulant performance was assessed based on final turbidity, removal efficiency, and pH variation, with dosages expressed as mg of active metal per liter to ensure comparability. Ferric chloride exhibited the highest turbidity removal efficiency, achieving a maximum removal efficiency of 96.2 ± 0.8% at 68.8 mg Fe/L and reducing turbidity to 7 ± 1 NTU. Ferric sulfate achieved a maximum removal efficiency of 92.5 ± 1.2%, while aluminum sulfate reached 84.9 ± 1.4% under the evaluated conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among coagulants at intermediate and high dose ranges (p < 0.05). The results indicate that ferric chloride provides the most effective clarification performance for the tested greywater matrix, while maintaining final pH values within a suitable range for non-potable reuse. This study contributes to coagulant selection for decentralized greywater treatment systems through standardized, quantitative comparison under identical operational conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physchem
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/physchem6030055
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Comparative Evaluation of Aluminum- and Iron-Based Coagulants for Domestic Greywater Treatment

Armando Josué Piña Díaz, Leonardo Gabriel Vega-Macotela, Iván Lenín Cruz-Jaramillo, Mauricio Aarón Pérez Romero
Physchem
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
article

Quantitative Comparative Evaluation of Aluminum- and Iron-Based Coagulants for Domestic Greywater Treatment

Armando Josué Piña Díaz, Leonardo Gabriel Vega-Macotela, Iván Lenín Cruz-Jaramillo, Mauricio Aarón Pérez Romero
article en

Abstract

Greywater treatment is an essential component of sustainable water management strategies, particularly in regions experiencing water scarcity. This study presents a quantitative comparative evaluation of three conventional inorganic coagulants—aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3), ferric sulfate (Fe2(SO4)3), and ferric chloride (FeCl3)—for domestic greywater treatment using standardized jar test procedures. The initial turbidity of the greywater was 186 ± 5 NTU. Coagulant performance was assessed based on final turbidity, removal efficiency, and pH variation, with dosages expressed as mg of active metal per liter to ensure comparability. Ferric chloride exhibited the highest turbidity removal efficiency, achieving a maximum removal efficiency of 96.2 ± 0.8% at 68.8 mg Fe/L and reducing turbidity to 7 ± 1 NTU. Ferric sulfate achieved a maximum removal efficiency of 92.5 ± 1.2%, while aluminum sulfate reached 84.9 ± 1.4% under the evaluated conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among coagulants at intermediate and high dose ranges (p < 0.05). The results indicate that ferric chloride provides the most effective clarification performance for the tested greywater matrix, while maintaining final pH values within a suitable range for non-potable reuse. This study contributes to coagulant selection for decentralized greywater treatment systems through standardized, quantitative comparison under identical operational conditions.

PhyschemVol. 6(3)
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.