B/ordering humanitarian action: the (in)security of SAR operations in Italy

This article intervenes in current debates on the Mediterranean border regime and suggests rethinking the concept of the ‘humanitarian border’. Drawing on Border and Critical Security Studies, it argues that the current Italian government is not simply governing and disciplining mobility, but is bordering, ordering and othering humanitarian action, and especially search and rescue (SAR) operations. While existing scholarship highlights the coexistence of securitarian and humanitarian rationalities, this article argues that, in the context of SAR operations, an analytical distinction between the two should be made. Specifically, it argues that the Meloni government has inaugurated a border regime in which the activation of SAR operations – whether by NGOs or the Italian Coast Guard – is systematically prevented, obscured, and made difficult. In light of this observation, this article introduces the concept of b/ordering humanitarian action as a theoretical prism through which to capture the hierarchical subordination of care and protection at sea to securitarian logic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2026.2723011
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B/ordering humanitarian action: the (in)security of SAR operations in Italy

Raffaela Puggioni
Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Global Security and Public Health
article

B/ordering humanitarian action: the (in)security of SAR operations in Italy

Raffaela Puggioni
article en

Abstract

This article intervenes in current debates on the Mediterranean border regime and suggests rethinking the concept of the ‘humanitarian border’. Drawing on Border and Critical Security Studies, it argues that the current Italian government is not simply governing and disciplining mobility, but is bordering, ordering and othering humanitarian action, and especially search and rescue (SAR) operations. While existing scholarship highlights the coexistence of securitarian and humanitarian rationalities, this article argues that, in the context of SAR operations, an analytical distinction between the two should be made. Specifically, it argues that the Meloni government has inaugurated a border regime in which the activation of SAR operations – whether by NGOs or the Italian Coast Guard – is systematically prevented, obscured, and made difficult. In light of this observation, this article introduces the concept of b/ordering humanitarian action as a theoretical prism through which to capture the hierarchical subordination of care and protection at sea to securitarian logic.

Journal of Contemporary European Studies
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Global University (LB)
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.