Social comparison interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analytical and conceptual evaluation of randomized controlled trials

Social comparison interventions (SCIs) have been shown to promote pro-environmental behavior (PEB), yet observed effect sizes are typically small. Given their scalability and cost-effectiveness, SCIs hold substantial potential for population-level behavior change. A deeper examination of the social comparison process may enable the development of more targeted interventions that enhance positive outcomes. We synthesized existing evidence to assess the efficacy of SCIs in promoting PEB and their conceptual implementation in practice. We first conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Meta-analytic findings of 38 publications reporting 41 trials indicated that SCIs produced small effects compared to both passive and active control conditions, across both short-term and long-term evaluations (Hedges’ g s = 0.09 to 0.16; most ps < .05). However, substantial heterogeneity and prediction intervals that included the null indicate considerable variability across trials, suggesting that these effects may not consistently generalize and should be interpreted with caution. The conceptual review revealed that most trials addressed electricity or water use, relied on written formats, and used group averages as comparison sources. Comparison direction was generally unrestricted. Interventions were primarily framed around sustainability motives, with prevention-oriented messaging more common than promotion-oriented framing. Notably, none of the included trials reported participants’ appraisal of the motivational significance of the comparison outcome or whether the comparison end goal was perceived as attainable. These omissions limit understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying SCI effects. We propose that SCI effectiveness can be strengthened by emphasizing the valuation process of comparison outcomes, incorporating personal and contextual determinants of behavior, and tailoring interventions to individual needs. Such refinements may increase the efficacy of SCIs in promoting effective and sustained PEB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2026-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102110
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social comparison interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analytical and conceptual evaluation of randomized controlled trials

Nexhmedin Morina, Emelie Pauli, Thole H. Hoppen, Rieke M. Cuno
Sustainable Futures
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Social comparison interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analytical and conceptual evaluation of randomized controlled trials

Nexhmedin Morina, Emelie Pauli, Thole H. Hoppen, Rieke M. Cuno
article en

Abstract

Social comparison interventions (SCIs) have been shown to promote pro-environmental behavior (PEB), yet observed effect sizes are typically small. Given their scalability and cost-effectiveness, SCIs hold substantial potential for population-level behavior change. A deeper examination of the social comparison process may enable the development of more targeted interventions that enhance positive outcomes. We synthesized existing evidence to assess the efficacy of SCIs in promoting PEB and their conceptual implementation in practice. We first conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Meta-analytic findings of 38 publications reporting 41 trials indicated that SCIs produced small effects compared to both passive and active control conditions, across both short-term and long-term evaluations (Hedges’ g s = 0.09 to 0.16; most ps < .05). However, substantial heterogeneity and prediction intervals that included the null indicate considerable variability across trials, suggesting that these effects may not consistently generalize and should be interpreted with caution. The conceptual review revealed that most trials addressed electricity or water use, relied on written formats, and used group averages as comparison sources. Comparison direction was generally unrestricted. Interventions were primarily framed around sustainability motives, with prevention-oriented messaging more common than promotion-oriented framing. Notably, none of the included trials reported participants’ appraisal of the motivational significance of the comparison outcome or whether the comparison end goal was perceived as attainable. These omissions limit understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying SCI effects. We propose that SCI effectiveness can be strengthened by emphasizing the valuation process of comparison outcomes, incorporating personal and contextual determinants of behavior, and tailoring interventions to individual needs. Such refinements may increase the efficacy of SCIs in promoting effective and sustained PEB.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 12
University of Münster (DE)
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.