“Swimming in the Dark”: A Q Methodology Study on the Career Development Needs of Doctoral Students in U.S. HRD Programs

Background Career development needs among doctoral students in human resource development (HRD) may vary according to career aspirations, professional experiences, social identities, financial circumstances, and institutional contexts. Yet limited research has examined how HRD doctoral students subjectively prioritize different forms of career development support. Purpose This study explored HRD doctoral students’ subjective perspectives on their career development needs and the factors associated with variations in those needs. Research Design A mixed-methods design combining Q methodology with focus group interviews (FGIs) was employed to identify shared and contrasting perspectives on career development support. Study Sample Seventeen doctoral students from six U.S. HRD programs completed Q-sorts, and 13 participated in follow-up FGIs. Data Collection and/or Analysis Participants sorted 70 career development statements derived from the literature, pilot interviews, and researcher discussions. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation was used to identify shared viewpoints. Factor arrays were interpreted using the crib-sheet method and supplemented with open-ended responses and FGI data. Results Three career development perspectives emerged: (1) support for academic appointments, (2) support for well-being, and (3) support for visibility and networking. Bipolar patterns further distinguished structural versus financial well-being needs and academic versus industry-oriented visibility and networking needs. Participants’ identities, positionalities, career aspirations, financial circumstances, and institutional and sociopolitical contexts shaped how they prioritized career development support. Conclusions HRD doctoral students do not experience career development needs uniformly. HRD programs should move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches by providing differentiated, identity-responsive, and career-path-specific support that addresses students’ academic preparation, well-being, and access to professional networks and visibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Developing Human Resources
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223261480245
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

“Swimming in the Dark”: A Q Methodology Study on the Career Development Needs of Doctoral Students in U.S. HRD Programs

Jeremy W. Bohonos, Stephanie Sisco, Cynthia Sims, Eunbi Sim et al.
Advances in Developing Human Resources
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

“Swimming in the Dark”: A Q Methodology Study on the Career Development Needs of Doctoral Students in U.S. HRD Programs

Jeremy W. Bohonos, Stephanie Sisco, Cynthia Sims, Eunbi Sim, Kevin Rose, Matthew W. Hurtienne, Hoda Parvaneh Shirazi
article en

Abstract

Background Career development needs among doctoral students in human resource development (HRD) may vary according to career aspirations, professional experiences, social identities, financial circumstances, and institutional contexts. Yet limited research has examined how HRD doctoral students subjectively prioritize different forms of career development support. Purpose This study explored HRD doctoral students’ subjective perspectives on their career development needs and the factors associated with variations in those needs. Research Design A mixed-methods design combining Q methodology with focus group interviews (FGIs) was employed to identify shared and contrasting perspectives on career development support. Study Sample Seventeen doctoral students from six U.S. HRD programs completed Q-sorts, and 13 participated in follow-up FGIs. Data Collection and/or Analysis Participants sorted 70 career development statements derived from the literature, pilot interviews, and researcher discussions. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation was used to identify shared viewpoints. Factor arrays were interpreted using the crib-sheet method and supplemented with open-ended responses and FGI data. Results Three career development perspectives emerged: (1) support for academic appointments, (2) support for well-being, and (3) support for visibility and networking. Bipolar patterns further distinguished structural versus financial well-being needs and academic versus industry-oriented visibility and networking needs. Participants’ identities, positionalities, career aspirations, financial circumstances, and institutional and sociopolitical contexts shaped how they prioritized career development support. Conclusions HRD doctoral students do not experience career development needs uniformly. HRD programs should move beyond one-size-fits-all approaches by providing differentiated, identity-responsive, and career-path-specific support that addresses students’ academic preparation, well-being, and access to professional networks and visibility.

Advances in Developing Human Resources
Boise State University (US), University of Minnesota (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), The University of Texas at Tyler (US), Mitchell Institute (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.