Cross-Domain Generalization of a CNN Trained on Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Histopathology Using External Validation on Metastatic Lymph Node Tissue

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform well in histopathological classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but their robustness across distinct tissue domains remains insufficiently studied. This study assessed whether a CNN trained only on primary oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma images remained transferable to an independent metastatic lymph node histopathology dataset. Methods: Three public datasets containing 14,760 OSCC/OPSCC and 8530 normal oral mucosa images were combined for model development. An ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNetB0 backbone was used as a fixed feature extractor with a task-specific binary classification head. Performance was first assessed on an independent internal testing subset and subsequently evaluated on 20,000 H&E-stained normal and metastatic lymph node patches from a separate public dataset. Results: The model achieved an internal testing accuracy of 91.48%, with 92.95% sensitivity, 88.92% specificity, 93.56% precision, a 93.25% F1-score, and a Youden’s J index of 0.819. External validation resulted in a substantial decrease in overall classification performance, with an accuracy of 56.91%, specificity of 33.32%, precision of 48.71%, F1-score of 63.37%, balanced accuracy of 61.99%, MCC of 0.279, and a Youden’s J index of 0.240. Nevertheless, sensitivity for metastatic tissue remained high at 90.66%, indicating a markedly asymmetric external error profile characterized predominantly by false-positive classifications. Conclusions: The marked performance decrease during external validation demonstrates the limitations of direct cross-domain transfer between substantially different histopathological environments. However, the preserved sensitivity suggests that some discriminative information remained transferable beyond the development domain. These findings support partial rather than universal cross-domain generalization and emphasize the importance of independent out-of-distribution evaluation when assessing deep learning robustness in computational pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172752
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Domain Generalization of a CNN Trained on Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Histopathology Using External Validation on Metastatic Lymph Node Tissue

Adrian Costache, Alina Oancea, Mihai Dumitru, Daniela Vrînceanu et al.
Cancers
AI in cancer detection
article

Cross-Domain Generalization of a CNN Trained on Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Histopathology Using External Validation on Metastatic Lymph Node Tissue

Adrian Costache, Alina Oancea, Mihai Dumitru, Daniela Vrînceanu, Iulian Alexandru Taciuc, Alexandru-Darius DRAGOMIR-SERBOIU, Lorena Adriana Paun, Andreea Marinescu, Monica-Mihaela Cirstoiu
article en

Abstract

Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) perform well in histopathological classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), but their robustness across distinct tissue domains remains insufficiently studied. This study assessed whether a CNN trained only on primary oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma images remained transferable to an independent metastatic lymph node histopathology dataset. Methods: Three public datasets containing 14,760 OSCC/OPSCC and 8530 normal oral mucosa images were combined for model development. An ImageNet-pretrained EfficientNetB0 backbone was used as a fixed feature extractor with a task-specific binary classification head. Performance was first assessed on an independent internal testing subset and subsequently evaluated on 20,000 H&E-stained normal and metastatic lymph node patches from a separate public dataset. Results: The model achieved an internal testing accuracy of 91.48%, with 92.95% sensitivity, 88.92% specificity, 93.56% precision, a 93.25% F1-score, and a Youden’s J index of 0.819. External validation resulted in a substantial decrease in overall classification performance, with an accuracy of 56.91%, specificity of 33.32%, precision of 48.71%, F1-score of 63.37%, balanced accuracy of 61.99%, MCC of 0.279, and a Youden’s J index of 0.240. Nevertheless, sensitivity for metastatic tissue remained high at 90.66%, indicating a markedly asymmetric external error profile characterized predominantly by false-positive classifications. Conclusions: The marked performance decrease during external validation demonstrates the limitations of direct cross-domain transfer between substantially different histopathological environments. However, the preserved sensitivity suggests that some discriminative information remained transferable beyond the development domain. These findings support partial rather than universal cross-domain generalization and emphasize the importance of independent out-of-distribution evaluation when assessing deep learning robustness in computational pathology.

CancersVol. 18(17)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Emergency University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.