Beyond receiving: feedback literacy as a catalyst for resident growth, a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Feedback literacy is gaining momentum in health professions education as an important driver of learning. It involves the capacity to interpret, engage with and act on feedback in ways that promote genuine improvement. While strengthening feedback literacy could make feedback more impactful, it is unclear how effectively resident doctors use these skills in practice. METHODS: . Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and PsychINFO) were searched for relevant peer-reviewed research studies published between 2015 and 2024. Studies were included that explored residents' feedback literacy in the context of receiving feedback from senior clinicians. Information was extracted for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 1048 articles screened, 15 met inclusion criteria and only one was an intervention designed to enhance feedback literacy. Although residents valued feedback, their engagement with it varied widely. Few studies explored how residents judged their own performance, managed emotional responses or acted on feedback. No studies assessed the long-term impact of feedback literacy training on learning or clinical performance. CONCLUSION: Feedback literacy offers a promising pathway to strengthen residents' capacity as purposeful, growth-oriented learners. However, meaningful progress will depend on moving beyond delivering feedback well to explicitly teaching residents how to use it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Education Online
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2026.2722433
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond receiving: feedback literacy as a catalyst for resident growth, a scoping review

Sandra Carr, Alison Freeth
Medical Education Online
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Beyond receiving: feedback literacy as a catalyst for resident growth, a scoping review

Sandra Carr, Alison Freeth
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Feedback literacy is gaining momentum in health professions education as an important driver of learning. It involves the capacity to interpret, engage with and act on feedback in ways that promote genuine improvement. While strengthening feedback literacy could make feedback more impactful, it is unclear how effectively resident doctors use these skills in practice. METHODS: . Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and PsychINFO) were searched for relevant peer-reviewed research studies published between 2015 and 2024. Studies were included that explored residents' feedback literacy in the context of receiving feedback from senior clinicians. Information was extracted for thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 1048 articles screened, 15 met inclusion criteria and only one was an intervention designed to enhance feedback literacy. Although residents valued feedback, their engagement with it varied widely. Few studies explored how residents judged their own performance, managed emotional responses or acted on feedback. No studies assessed the long-term impact of feedback literacy training on learning or clinical performance. CONCLUSION: Feedback literacy offers a promising pathway to strengthen residents' capacity as purposeful, growth-oriented learners. However, meaningful progress will depend on moving beyond delivering feedback well to explicitly teaching residents how to use it.

Medical Education OnlineVol. 31(1)
University of Health and Allied Sciences (GH), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.