Comparative Effectiveness of Mebeverine and Otilonium Bromide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that significantly impairs patients’ quality of life. Antispasmodics such as mebeverine and otilonium bromide (OB) are commonly used as first-line therapies; however, comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness and safety profile remains limited. This study aimed to compare short-term changes in health-related quality of life and the occurrence of adverse events among IBS patients receiving mebeverine or otilonium bromide. A prospective cohort study was conducted from December 2024 to July 2025 among 110 IBS patients meeting the Rome IV criteria who received either mebeverine 200 mg or OB 40 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. The IBS-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (IBS-QOL) was interviewer-administered at baseline and after treatment (week 4). Adverse drug events were documented and classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). After 4 weeks, significant within-group improvements in the overall IBS-QOL score and most domain scores were observed in both treatment groups. In the unadjusted between-group analysis, the mean improvement in the overall IBS-QOL score was greater in the mebeverine group than in the otilonium bromide group (20.31 ± 13.17 vs. 14.62 ± 14.61; p = 0.034). However, treatment group was not independently associated with change in the overall IBS-QOL score after multivariable adjustment (OB vs. mebeverine: B = −4.63, 95% CI −10.28 to 1.02; p = 0.107). Nominal differences in activity interference and health worry did not remain statistically significant after Holm correction for multiple domain-level comparisons. Adverse events occurred in 9 of 110 patients (8.2%), with no significant difference between the mebeverine and otilonium bromide groups (11.7% vs. 4.0%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.178). All reported events were mild. In this prospective observational cohort, both mebeverine and otilonium bromide use was associated with short-term improvement in health-related quality of life and low rates of mild adverse events. Although the unadjusted change in the overall IBS-QOL score favored mebeverine, the adjusted analysis did not establish an independent difference between the two treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16091390
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Mebeverine and Otilonium Bromide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Thong Duy Vo, Anh Thi Phuong Luu
Life
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Mebeverine and Otilonium Bromide on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Thong Duy Vo, Anh Thi Phuong Luu
article en

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that significantly impairs patients’ quality of life. Antispasmodics such as mebeverine and otilonium bromide (OB) are commonly used as first-line therapies; however, comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness and safety profile remains limited. This study aimed to compare short-term changes in health-related quality of life and the occurrence of adverse events among IBS patients receiving mebeverine or otilonium bromide. A prospective cohort study was conducted from December 2024 to July 2025 among 110 IBS patients meeting the Rome IV criteria who received either mebeverine 200 mg or OB 40 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. The IBS-specific quality-of-life questionnaire (IBS-QOL) was interviewer-administered at baseline and after treatment (week 4). Adverse drug events were documented and classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). After 4 weeks, significant within-group improvements in the overall IBS-QOL score and most domain scores were observed in both treatment groups. In the unadjusted between-group analysis, the mean improvement in the overall IBS-QOL score was greater in the mebeverine group than in the otilonium bromide group (20.31 ± 13.17 vs. 14.62 ± 14.61; p = 0.034). However, treatment group was not independently associated with change in the overall IBS-QOL score after multivariable adjustment (OB vs. mebeverine: B = −4.63, 95% CI −10.28 to 1.02; p = 0.107). Nominal differences in activity interference and health worry did not remain statistically significant after Holm correction for multiple domain-level comparisons. Adverse events occurred in 9 of 110 patients (8.2%), with no significant difference between the mebeverine and otilonium bromide groups (11.7% vs. 4.0%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.178). All reported events were mild. In this prospective observational cohort, both mebeverine and otilonium bromide use was associated with short-term improvement in health-related quality of life and low rates of mild adverse events. Although the unadjusted change in the overall IBS-QOL score favored mebeverine, the adjusted analysis did not establish an independent difference between the two treatments.

LifeVol. 16(9)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (VN), University Medical Center HCMC (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.