A New Proof Using Cones for Archimedes’ Volume Propositions on Conoids and Spheroids

This paper presents a new proof of Archimedes’ volume propositions for conoids and spheroids that unifies the treatment of all three conic sections. While Archimedes established that solids generated by rotating conic sections maintain specific volume ratios to cones with the same base and axis, his original arguments—both the exhaustion method in On Conoids and Spheroids and the mechanical approach in Method—require distinct arguments for each type of conic section. Our approach transforms both the conic solid and its reference cone into combinations of cone-related figures through an axis-stretching technique, then establishes volume ratios using only elementary proportional relationships. This unified geometric treatment reveals the underlying structural unity between different conic sections, while employing only tools from Euclid’s Elements and techniques found throughout Archimedes’ works.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Mathematical Monthly
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2026.2697710
Primary Topic
History and Theory of Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Proof Using Cones for Archimedes’ Volume Propositions on Conoids and Spheroids

Eunsoo Lee, Byungchang So
American Mathematical Monthly
History and Theory of Mathematics
article

A New Proof Using Cones for Archimedes’ Volume Propositions on Conoids and Spheroids

Eunsoo Lee, Byungchang So
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a new proof of Archimedes’ volume propositions for conoids and spheroids that unifies the treatment of all three conic sections. While Archimedes established that solids generated by rotating conic sections maintain specific volume ratios to cones with the same base and axis, his original arguments—both the exhaustion method in On Conoids and Spheroids and the mechanical approach in Method—require distinct arguments for each type of conic section. Our approach transforms both the conic solid and its reference cone into combinations of cone-related figures through an axis-stretching technique, then establishes volume ratios using only elementary proportional relationships. This unified geometric treatment reveals the underlying structural unity between different conic sections, while employing only tools from Euclid’s Elements and techniques found throughout Archimedes’ works.

American Mathematical Monthly
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
History and Theory of Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A New Proof Using Cones for Archimedes’ Volume Propositions on Conoids and Spheroids — Eunsoo Lee, Byungchang So · American Mathematical Monthly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS