Injection-based safety of aqueous venom immunotherapy during venom extract shortage: impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy. Nationwide shortages of depot venom extracts necessitated transition to aqueous preparations, but real-world safety data on this switch remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the injection-based safety of aqueous VIT and the impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching on systemic reactions (SRs). METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort included 31 aqueous VIT courses in 30 adults treated between January 2023 and January 2026. Patients initiated aqueous VIT or were compulsorily switched from depot preparations. SRs were assessed at treatment-course and injection levels. Predictors were evaluated using Firth penalized logistic regression. RESULTS: = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueous VIT remained feasible during the depot extract shortage despite a higher-than-previously-reported SR rate. Comorbid disease predicted SRs, while forced switching may identify patients requiring closer monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Immunotherapy
Published
2026-08-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1750743x.2026.2722552
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injection-based safety of aqueous venom immunotherapy during venom extract shortage: impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching

Gökten Bulut, Fidan Coşkun, Şefika Karabaş, Rukiye Demiralp
Immunotherapy
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Injection-based safety of aqueous venom immunotherapy during venom extract shortage: impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching

Gökten Bulut, Fidan Coşkun, Şefika Karabaş, Rukiye Demiralp
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy. Nationwide shortages of depot venom extracts necessitated transition to aqueous preparations, but real-world safety data on this switch remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the injection-based safety of aqueous VIT and the impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching on systemic reactions (SRs). METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort included 31 aqueous VIT courses in 30 adults treated between January 2023 and January 2026. Patients initiated aqueous VIT or were compulsorily switched from depot preparations. SRs were assessed at treatment-course and injection levels. Predictors were evaluated using Firth penalized logistic regression. RESULTS: = 0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueous VIT remained feasible during the depot extract shortage despite a higher-than-previously-reported SR rate. Comorbid disease predicted SRs, while forced switching may identify patients requiring closer monitoring.

Immunotherapy
Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Injection-based safety of aqueous venom immunotherapy during venom extract shortage: impact of forced depot-to-aqueous switching — Gökten Bulut, Fidan Coşkun, et al. · Immunotherapy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS